| 31 May 2024 |
 das-g | In reply to @imincik:matrix.org
Another ZHF PR, easy to review: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/314801 This should probably be backported to 24.05. Shall I add the labels backport release-24.05 and/or backport staging-24.05? | 14:42:42 |
| 2 Jun 2024 |
 Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @das-g:matrix.org
This should probably be backported to 24.05. Shall I add the labels backport release-24.05 and/or backport staging-24.05? Yes, please add the label. Sorry, I forgot to do it. | 19:58:10 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Should be back ported to release-24.05 | 19:59:16 |
| 3 Jun 2024 |
| das-g | Backport to staging-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316915
Backport to release-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316916 | 13:54:59 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @das-g:matrix.org
Backport to staging-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316915
Backport to release-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316916 Why two PRs (one to staging and one to master) | 13:56:39 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @das-g:matrix.org
Backport to staging-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316915
Backport to release-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316916 * Why two PRs (one to staging and one to master) ? | 13:56:43 |
| das-g | I've seen it done this way during ZHF for stuff that blocks other builds on both branches. Is it to be handled differently after release? Oder was that the wrong thing to do already during ZHF? | 14:00:15 |
| das-g | In reply to @imincik:matrix.org
Should be back ported to release-24.05 Ah, I see you mentioned only the release branch here. Shall I close the PR to staging? | 14:01:27 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @das-g:matrix.org
I've seen it done this way during ZHF for stuff that blocks other builds on both branches. Is it to be handled differently after release? Oder was that the wrong thing to do already during ZHF? I am not sure about ZHF, but for now we need only one PR to master. | 14:01:34 |
| das-g | master already has the change through https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/314801. But as the release branches were cut off before that, they don't have it yet. | 14:02:41 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @das-g:matrix.org
I've seen it done this way during ZHF for stuff that blocks other builds on both branches. Is it to be handled differently after release? Oder was that the wrong thing to do already during ZHF? * I am not sure about ZHF, but for now we need only one PR to release-24.05. | 14:03:22 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @das-g:matrix.org
master already has the change through https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/314801. But as the release branches were cut off before that, they don't have it yet. Sorry, to release-24.05. | 14:03:44 |
| das-g | I'll close the staging one then and remove that tag. | 14:04:03 |
| das-g | * ~Backport to staging-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316915~
Backport to release-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316916 | 14:07:51 |
| das-g | * ~~Backport to staging-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316915~~
Backport to release-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316916 | 14:08:01 |
| das-g | * Backport to staging-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316915
Backport to release-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316916 | 14:08:12 |
| 9 Jun 2024 |
 sikmir | More geospatial packages: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/318448 | 06:22:19 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | sikmir: are you able to run nixpkgs-review on Darwin for libspatialindex PR ? Thanks | 09:25:47 |
| 10 Jun 2024 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | GDAL 3.9 PR finally ready for review - https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/311310 | 16:46:22 |
| 11 Jun 2024 |
| sikmir | nixpkgs-review pr 311310 takes me already 20h5m15s on darwin, I guess it's no hope to get it done) At least 3 fails so far: python3.11-python-mapnik-unstable-2023-02-23, mapnik-unstable-2023-11-28 and octave-8.4.0-geometry-unstable-2021-07-07. | 13:17:55 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @sikmir:matrix.org
nixpkgs-review pr 311310 takes me already 20h5m15s on darwin, I guess it's no hope to get it done) At least 3 fails so far: python3.11-python-mapnik-unstable-2023-02-23, mapnik-unstable-2023-11-28 and octave-8.4.0-geometry-unstable-2021-07-07. Thanks for trying. None of those failed packages are blockers for merging. Am I right ? | 13:25:00 |
| 14 Jun 2024 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | We have GDAL PR ready for final approval https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/311310 | 08:10:25 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | * We have GDAL PR ready for final approval before merge https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/311310 | 08:10:38 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Also GEOS update is waiting for review - https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/317722 | 08:11:09 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | And libspatialite update as well https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/318245 | 08:11:33 |
| 15 Jun 2024 |
 nh2 | libtiff static linking fix: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/320105 | 17:53:48 |
| 20 Jun 2024 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | My Nix presentation at GRASS community sprint - https://github.com/imincik/nix-presentations/blob/master/grass-community-meeting-2024/presentation.md . Idea of using Nix was quite well received and it will bring following new features for GRASS users and devs:
- Dev environment built by Nix
- Ability to run development version of GRASS from github source code
PRs
- https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/3889
- https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/3906
My goal is to do the same for all FOSS4G projects .
| 08:14:48 |
| 23 Jun 2024 |
| nh2 | Need an easy review:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/321966 | 13:40:45 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @nh2:matrix.org
Need an easy review:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/321966 Approved now. | 16:59:46 |
| nh2 | In reply to @imincik:matrix.org
Approved now. Thanks! Merged. | 17:00:31 |
