!yxFWYdmeLrdzdoIrcE:maralorn.de

nix-output-monitor

98 Members
https://github.com/maralorn/nix-output-monitor32 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
27 Jan 2024
@lehmanator:gnulinux.club@lehmanator:gnulinux.club left the room.17:05:53
29 Jan 2024
@lehmanator:tchncs.deSam Lehman joined the room.11:06:43
31 Jan 2024
@federicodschonborn:matrix.org@federicodschonborn:matrix.org changed their profile picture.03:36:42
@federicodschonborn:matrix.org@federicodschonborn:matrix.org changed their profile picture.06:22:18
2 Feb 2024
@tanja-6584:matrix.orgTanja (Old; I'm now @tanja:catgirl.cloud) joined the room.17:51:58
3 Feb 2024
@raboof:matrix.orgraboof changed their display name from raboof to raboof @FOSDEM.07:38:53
4 Feb 2024
@raboof:matrix.orgraboof changed their display name from raboof @FOSDEM to raboof.17:41:46
16 Feb 2024
@lord-valen:matrix.orglord-valen joined the room.18:59:14
18 Feb 2024
@aloisw:kde.org@aloisw:kde.org joined the room.18:08:35
22 Feb 2024
@philiptaron:matrix.orgPhilip Taron (UTC-8) Is there a way to patch nixos-rebuild so that it uses nix-output-monitor by default? 21:47:11
23 Feb 2024
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralorn Philip Taron (UTC-8): Certainly, quite a few people do it. 08:59:46
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornThe easiest way right now is to run nom-build on the system closure expression right before running nixos-rebuild.09:00:37
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornI think to really use nom in nixos-rebuild we need to add a tiny bit of behavior to nom.09:01:31
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornI will get to it sometime this year.09:01:50
@philiptaron:matrix.orgPhilip Taron (UTC-8)
In reply to @maralorn:maralorn.de
I think to really use nom in nixos-rebuild we need to add a tiny bit of behavior to nom.
What're you thinking?
16:20:55
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornIf I remember correctly nixos-rebuild calls a few nix commands which are currently not supported by the nom drop in.16:24:48
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornI fix would be trivial, but I never dared to approach that because it requires adding nom specific plumbing directly in the nixpkgs code. Although at this point I think nom has so much traction in the community that opt-in nom support in nixos-rebuild would probably be accepted.16:27:19
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralorn * A fix would be trivial, but I never dared to approach that because it requires adding nom specific plumbing directly in the nixpkgs code. Although at this point I think nom has so much traction in the community that opt-in nom support in nixos-rebuild would probably be accepted.16:27:25
@philiptaron:matrix.orgPhilip Taron (UTC-8)It looks like there's just one place that nix-build is called in nixos-rebuild. I'll see if I can substitute it in my own overlay.16:28:22
@philiptaron:matrix.orgPhilip Taron (UTC-8) (Thank you for nom, btw. Beautiful piece of work.) 16:29:26
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralorn Philip Taron (UTC-8): If you find that a specific change in nom would be helpful, please let me know. 16:29:46
@k900:0upti.meK900I'm pretty sure it should be very easy to add16:30:12
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornAlso if you find some solution which could reasonably be upstreamed into nixpkgs, that would be awesome.16:30:14
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralorn K900 ⚡️: I also think so. 16:30:35
@k900:0upti.meK900I've read nixos-rebuild like two days ago16:31:07
25 Feb 2024
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.org joined the room.20:14:06
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orghi!20:14:34
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orgis there a way to completely disable color output? 20:14:44
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralorn qbit: Currently not, now. 21:57:23
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornWhy would you want that?21:57:33

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9