| 8 Oct 2025 |
 maralorn | Or like nom is currently broken on hydra? | 19:52:25 |
| maralorn | Looks like the flake because -Werror should not be active in production. | 19:52:55 |
| maralorn | Okay | 19:54:16 |
| maralorn | Well, thanks for the report but this will probably come up for me anyway on friday when my renovate bot bumps the nixos-unstable pin on the nom repo. 😄 | 19:55:59 |
 Sandro 🐧 | Yeah, the flake actually, I forgot | 19:56:13 |
| Sandro 🐧 | Maybe I should switch over to the nixpkgs package again 😅 | 19:56:18 |
| maralorn | I mean it’s not like nom development speed is so high that using the flake buys you much. 😄 | 19:57:15 |
| maralorn | What’s confusing me, however is the error message itself. | 19:58:24 |
| maralorn | I really can’t imagine how this code could compile without this constraint. | 19:58:51 |
| maralorn | Oh, I take that back. | 19:59:16 |
| maralorn | Cool | 19:59:35 |
| Sandro 🐧 | Probably from something even last year where I was waiting for some fix or so. If I can't remember it might not even be necessary | 20:01:11 |
| 12 Oct 2025 |
|  Anton (he/him) changed their display name from Anton to Anton (he/him). | 13:17:12 |
| 13 Oct 2025 |
|  vivekanandan_ks joined the room. | 18:56:34 |
| 18 Oct 2025 |
|  whispers (it/fae) changed their display name from dawnofmidnight to whispers. | 05:34:34 |
| 23 Oct 2025 |
 Philip Taron (UTC-8) | I just opened https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/454982 to allow nom to pin a specific Nix or Lix version. | 17:51:31 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | My usecase is to use nom in nixos-rebuild and nixos-rebuild-ng, both of which are particular about pinning Nix to a specific version before they go about their work. | 17:52:24 |
| 28 Oct 2025 |
|  lillecarl joined the room. | 22:01:48 |
| 2 Nov 2025 |
| whispers (it/fae) changed their display name from whispers to whispers (it/fae). | 17:58:08 |
