| 8 Oct 2025 |
 maralorn | Looks like the flake because -Werror should not be active in production. | 19:52:55 |
| maralorn | Okay | 19:54:16 |
| maralorn | Well, thanks for the report but this will probably come up for me anyway on friday when my renovate bot bumps the nixos-unstable pin on the nom repo. 😄 | 19:55:59 |
 Sandro 🐧 | Yeah, the flake actually, I forgot | 19:56:13 |
| Sandro 🐧 | Maybe I should switch over to the nixpkgs package again 😅 | 19:56:18 |
| maralorn | I mean it’s not like nom development speed is so high that using the flake buys you much. 😄 | 19:57:15 |
| maralorn | What’s confusing me, however is the error message itself. | 19:58:24 |
| maralorn | I really can’t imagine how this code could compile without this constraint. | 19:58:51 |
| maralorn | Oh, I take that back. | 19:59:16 |
| maralorn | Cool | 19:59:35 |
| Sandro 🐧 | Probably from something even last year where I was waiting for some fix or so. If I can't remember it might not even be necessary | 20:01:11 |
| 12 Oct 2025 |
|  Anton (he/him) changed their display name from Anton to Anton (he/him). | 13:17:12 |
| 13 Oct 2025 |
|  vivekanandan_ks joined the room. | 18:56:34 |
| 18 Oct 2025 |
|  dawnofmidnight changed their display name from dawnofmidnight to whispers. | 05:34:34 |
| 23 Oct 2025 |
 Philip Taron (UTC-8) | I just opened https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/454982 to allow nom to pin a specific Nix or Lix version. | 17:51:31 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | My usecase is to use nom in nixos-rebuild and nixos-rebuild-ng, both of which are particular about pinning Nix to a specific version before they go about their work. | 17:52:24 |
| 28 Oct 2025 |
|  lillecarl joined the room. | 22:01:48 |
| 2 Nov 2025 |
| dawnofmidnight changed their display name from whispers to whispers (it/fae). | 17:58:08 |
| 3 Nov 2025 |
 loudgolem | wow, never knew this was a thing
asciinema-3.0.1 (buildPhase) ⏱ 4m21s (∅ 6m31s)
i.e the ETA. I recently came across some pr which fixes generation of build reports I guess that allows tracking this.
| 18:14:09 |
| loudgolem | * wow, never knew this was a thing
asciinema-3.0.1 (buildPhase) ⏱ 4m21s (∅ 6m31s)
i.e the ETA (6m31s). I recently came across some pr which fixes generation of build reports I guess that allows tracking this.
| 18:20:02 |
| maralorn | Yeah, that was a feature a few years ago. Then I broke it. Then someone fixed it a few days ago again. 🤣 | 21:37:28 |
| maralorn | However I haven’t cut a release with the fix afaict. | 21:37:41 |
| 4 Nov 2025 |
|  whispers (it/fae) joined the room. | 20:07:00 |
| dawnofmidnight left the room. | 20:07:07 |
| 9 Nov 2025 |
| maralorn | Today I released https://code.maralorn.de/maralorn/nix-output-monitor/releases/tag/v2.1.7 (and 2.1.8 with a bug fix for the former). | 05:17:55 |
| maralorn | And then I didn’t go to bed. | 05:18:02 |
| maralorn | Instead I did some larger refactorings. | 05:18:15 |
| maralorn | ssh-ng support is now best in class. | 05:18:33 |
| maralorn | And we have download progress reporting. | 05:18:41 |
| maralorn | All available on main. | 05:18:49 |
