| 12 Apr 2024 |
 maralorn | That is an overapproximation. | 13:05:10 |
| maralorn | Let’s say 100 Haskell apss. | 13:05:21 |
| maralorn | Maybe a third of them are in some way Haskell tooling. | 13:06:04 |
| maralorn | So maybe 70 non-navel-gazing Haskell programs. | 13:07:12 |
| maralorn | And they are not all toy-language compilers either. 😄 | 13:07:59 |
 @shalokshalom:kde.org | guess the ghc could be named too ;) | 13:32:03 |
| @shalokshalom:kde.org | I think Elm is one of my favorite Haskell programs | 13:32:28 |
| @shalokshalom:kde.org | since its not written in the typical Haskell maniac style ^^ | 13:32:43 |
| maralorn | Well, ghc counts as Haskell tooling. | 15:25:16 |
| maralorn | But I agree that it’s probably the most formidable Haskell software ever written. | 15:25:35 |
| @shalokshalom:kde.org | ghc or elm? | 15:25:54 |
| maralorn | ghc, I don’t know much about elm. | 15:26:50 |
