| 28 Jan 2026 |
Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | I saw it mentioned | 09:33:39 |
Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | flake compat? | 09:36:51 |
Coca | hopefully nothing you have to use would be flake only | 09:37:36 |
Coca | I think I've only seen it once ever and it was for niri I think? | 09:38:05 |
Coca | Though I'm sure someone has thrown out some other example | 09:38:30 |
Coca | You can also take a look at https://nilla.dev/ as well for this | 09:39:21 |
aloisw | In reply to @sofiedotcafe:matrix.org what if they don't expose such At least home-manager and impermanence have entry points that work without flakes. No entirely sure if they're official, but I haven't seen them break either. | 09:43:11 |
toonn | I do use flake-compat for some Flake-only project. | 09:59:46 |
delroth | (this discussion is imo precisely why flakes has won and why any flakes alternative without explicit compatibility support for flakes is doomed to fail) | 10:03:44 |
delroth | * (this discussion is imo precisely why flakes has won and why (again, imo) any flakes alternative without explicit compatibility support for flakes is doomed to fail) | 10:07:18 |
ShalokShalom | In reply to @coca162:matrix.org You can also take a look at https://nilla.dev/ as well for this Looks neat! Although I kinda agree, so much as I personally dislike Flakes, would backwards compatibility be crucial for its success, I think.
Thanks for showing us this! | 11:49:50 |
piegames | In reply to @delroth:delroth.net (this discussion is imo precisely why flakes has won and why (again, imo) any flakes alternative without explicit compatibility support for flakes is doomed to fail) I mean flake-compat exists, not sure why keep asking about compat tools that already exists | 11:52:33 |
piegames | * I mean flake-compat exists, not sure why keep asking about compat tools that already exist | 11:52:41 |
piegames | I first-class integration what people want? One could add a flake input type to npins probably if that's what people want | 11:53:31 |
piegames | * Is first-class integration what people want? One could add a flake input type to npins probably if that's what people want | 11:53:46 |
delroth | I mean, I know I would want it if I were to use npins, but I don't use npins other than when I contribute to a project that uses it | 11:54:11 |
delroth | so I'm probably not the right person to ask, or at least not via point-questions like this since most likely this isn't the only feature that stops me from using npins personally | 11:54:53 |
piegames | I mean npins is fairly feature complete by now and in need of a successor, so I'm interested in hearing your show-stoppers for using it | 11:56:13 |
Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | vs npins? | 11:56:33 |
piegames | Fixes won't land in npins, but will help inform any efforts at building a successor | 11:56:58 |
Coca | you can use with it npins just like sprinkles, it only handles the schema part of flakes, just like in sprinkles | 11:57:16 |
Lotte (it/its)/Cinny (she/her) θΔ& | you’d use both together seemingly | 11:57:21 |
Coca | * you can use it with npins just like sprinkles, it only handles the schema part of flakes, just like in sprinkles | 11:57:27 |
Coca | * you can use it with npins, it only handles the schema part of flakes, just like in sprinkles | 11:57:43 |
piegames | (I consider nilla et al merely alternatives to npins – same as npins to niv – and not successors, because they don't fundamentally improve upon the core formula) | 11:58:03 |
Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | so, Nilla vs Sprinkles | 12:05:20 |
Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | Why not combine forces? | 12:05:29 |
ShalokShalom | In reply to @piegames:flausch.social I mean npins is fairly feature complete by now and in need of a successor, so I'm interested in hearing your show-stoppers for using it I read they are no full replacement for flakes | 12:15:35 |
Coca | pinning inputs and schemas are two pretty different things for a single tool to handle, so most focus on one or the other | 12:20:30 |
niko ⚡️ | What do you think npins is lacking in? | 13:12:25 |