| 10 May 2024 |
 Janik (they/them) | Did you check if we actually received funds? 🙈 | 12:10:36 |
 Eelco | yes | 12:11:19 |
| Janik (they/them) | sorry can you be a bit more verbose, do you mean yes we received funds or yes you checked, that's a important difference. | 12:14:14 |
| Eelco | yes I checked and yes we received | 12:16:00 |
 raitobezarius | My understanding is that folks are interested to understand if, in the following report https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixos-foundation-financial-summary-a-transparent-look-into-2023/43640, are those funds counted there under company donations or personal donations? Given that they are technically third-party donations via the Benevity proxy | 12:19:33 |
|  fpletz joined the room. | 12:43:54 |
|  Winter changed their display name from Winter to Winter (test). | 13:34:02 |
| Winter changed their display name from Winter (test) to Winter. | 13:34:28 |
 twitchy0 | Am I supposed to submit funding requests in advance?
https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/issues/152 | 18:48:30 |
| twitchy0 | Is a ~$25-30 expense per person appropriate? (I have limited catering options at pier 57) | 18:49:40 |
|  Marcus joined the room. | 23:09:27 |
| 11 May 2024 |
|  catcloud joined the room. | 02:18:18 |
 Arian | Oh damn! All the Mercury nix teams are coming to New York a week later | 07:42:08 |
| Arian | (including me). | 07:42:20 |
|  nat-418 changed their profile picture. | 14:46:41 |
 ronef | Ping the NY User Group! Sure we can find there a reason to get folks together! :) | 16:12:24 |
| ronef | I'm going to be out today (mostly), show Baka (the puppy) a bit of water. Super appreciative of all the efforts in the last few weeks. Remember that this is a marathon we're running together, and not a sprint. Take the time to check in on yourselves, loved ones, and everything else that might matter to you. Hope everyone has a restful Saturday/Sunday. ❤️
I'll send mandatory Baka pics at some point :) | 16:15:46 |
| 12 May 2024 |
 nyanbinary | https://nixpkgs.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/436732-Constitutional-assembly-applications/topic/Silvan.20Mosberger/near/438128853 | 00:38:03 |
| nyanbinary | It's very concerning to see that board members can "endorse"/vouch for applicants for the assembly | 00:38:20 |
| nyanbinary | Like does nobody see the conflict here lmfao | 00:39:04 |
| nyanbinary | Ron & Jonas vouched for Silvan here. | 00:40:46 |
| nyanbinary | Dare I say this is a bit biased :P | 00:45:24 |
 infinisil | nyanbinary I put it in myself, didn't ask them explicitly, I disclosed it in the conflict of interest section too | 00:46:18 |
| infinisil | Fully agreed that it looks a bit weird, but I don't think it should be. I helped them out a ton in the past two weeks ;) | 00:47:20 |
| nyanbinary | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
nyanbinary I put it in myself, didn't ask them explicitly, I disclosed it in the conflict of interest section too That still doesn't explain why they "vouch" for you though. | 00:48:44 |
| infinisil | nyanbinary It says "who can vouch for you", which I interpreted to mean that "if you ask these people about me, they'll probably say that they enjoyed working with me" | 00:50:43 |
| infinisil | And it's not like putting board members there has any influence anyways. It's the board itself that selects the assembly! | 00:51:41 |
 @sumner:nevarro.space | maybe it's a "English language being ambiguous" issue, as it could be interpreted as: "these people have endorsed me" | 00:52:41 |
|  @sky1e:mildlyfunctional.gay joined the room. | 00:53:14 |
| @sumner:nevarro.space | * maybe it's a "English language being ambiguous" issue, as it could be interpreted as: "these people have endorsed me" which appears to be not the correct interpretation | 00:53:25 |
