| 5 Oct 2021 |
 Janne Heß | https://switch-to-configuration.pl totally worth it | 21:44:32 |
 Arian | Lol | 22:00:04 |
| 6 Oct 2021 |
 Emil Karlson | so I was complaining about nix builder nice levels as always, it uses systemd service unit to set Nice, which systemd does, now I looked at my systemctl status and swa the builders are in my desktop session scope | 05:30:18 |
| Emil Karlson | and obviously they do not have nice level set | 05:30:40 |
| Emil Karlson | can someone explain what's going on | 05:30:59 |
| Emil Karlson | I don't have any special settings I am aware of, but maybe I do | 05:31:21 |
| Emil Karlson | I have in the past straced nix-daemon and I do see it spawning the builders | 05:31:53 |
| Emil Karlson | * so I was complaining about nix builder nice levels as always, it uses systemd service unit to set Nice, which systemd does, now I looked at my systemctl status and saw the builders are in my desktop session scope | 05:32:40 |
| Emil Karlson | I'll try that again, when the current build finishes | 05:33:12 |
| Emil Karlson | just to confirm I am not insane, someone could at least check systemctl status and see the builders' scope | 05:34:11 |
| Emil Karlson | (I'm on master from yesterday evening after pipewire aarch64 fix) | 05:34:50 |
| Emil Karlson | (maybe nix intentionally inherits the scope of the scope asking for the build to properly allocate resources) | 05:37:16 |
 Louis Bettens | In reply to @jkarlson:kapsi.fi
so I was complaining about nix builder nice levels as always, it uses systemd service unit to set Nice, which systemd does, now I looked at my systemctl status and saw the builders are in my desktop session scope Are you building as root? In my experience, root bypasses the daemon but an ordinary user does not... | 06:44:58 |
| Emil Karlson | yes, thanks | 07:06:16 |
| Emil Karlson | maybe should add this to the nice thing docs | 07:06:32 |
| Emil Karlson | I guess I can just use normal nice then | 07:06:41 |
|  Rosario Pulella changed their display name from rosariopulella to Rosuavio. | 10:38:28 |
| Rosario Pulella changed their display name from Rosuavio to Rosario Pulella. | 10:44:53 |
|  symphorien joined the room. | 13:52:38 |
|  nirahv (it is kanashimia) joined the room. | 21:26:04 |
|  kamadorueda joined the room. | 22:27:06 |
| 9 Oct 2021 |
|  coolshaurya joined the room. | 18:04:22 |
| 11 Oct 2021 |
 Finn Behrens (he/him) | andi-: do you known of this rfc? maybe it's something for you? | 06:59:11 |
 eyJhb | What is the best way to test a PR from systemd/systemd in NixOS? https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20976 | 07:26:40 |
| eyJhb | Because, the patch does not apply cleanly
systemd.package = pkgs.systemd.overrideAttrs(old: {
patches = old.patches ++ [
# ./patches/systemd-ipv6.patch
(pkgs.fetchpatch {
url = "https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20976.patch";
sha256 = "0wy536cf7qvmk1rjbq6xw1a0bkq4cmzhd4xwb0gjrn7kiaf31psp";
})
];
});
| 07:26:55 |
 lvkm | eyJhb: you're only getting a delegated prefix from your ISP? no framed prefix? :O | 07:34:14 |
| eyJhb | So.... lvkm I am still new to this. What is the difference? | 07:35:14 |
| lvkm | the delegated prefix is used for the LAN interfaces (what seems to work in your case), the framed prefix is intended to be used on the upstream interface | 07:36:23 |
| lvkm | if you are not getting one, then your ISPs ipv6 deployment is kinda broken :/ | 07:36:46 |
| lvkm | there shouldn't be any need to assign the delegated prefix to the upstream interface | 07:37:22 |
