| 7 Apr 2025 |
|  Tom (deprecated) joined the room. | 23:37:53 |
| 13 Apr 2025 |
|  John Ericson joined the room. | 18:49:01 |
|  Robert Hensing (roberth) joined the room. | 18:49:51 |
| John Ericson | abathur: current it appears the paper says there is an installer "working group" | 18:49:53 |
| John Ericson | * abathur: currently it appears the paper says there is an installer "working group" | 18:49:58 |
|  Jan Tojnar joined the room. | 18:50:03 |
| John Ericson | I don't think we have much of a formal notion of what "working group" is governance wise, would you like to be "bumped up" into a formal team? | 18:50:38 |
| John Ericson | One distinction made elsewhere is "working group = temporary group of people to get specific project done" vs "team = group of people working on something indefinitely" | 18:51:38 |
| John Ericson | So yes while teams are "more powerful", and also you've been working on installer stuff for a long time, I thought it would be good to before "promoting" you all into an indefinite obligation | 18:52:25 |
| John Ericson | * So yes while teams are "more powerful", and also you've been working on installer stuff for a long time, I thought it would be good to ask you before "promoting" you all into an indefinite obligation | 18:57:02 |
| John Ericson | (edited, for the get "to ask" verb above) | 18:57:25 |
 cole-h | In reply to @Ericson2314:matrix.org
One distinction made elsewhere is "working group = temporary group of people to get specific project done" vs "team = group of people working on something indefinitely" I'll let them speak for themselves in more detail if they desire, but I believe the "temporary group of people" is actually a desired quality :P | 19:48:49 |
| John Ericson | that's fine if so! | 19:49:16 |
