| 1 Aug 2025 |
 dramforever | no i don't think loongarch is any more mips than riscv is | 12:03:19 |
 emily | like it's MIPS brain but I don't think you can call it MIPS | 12:03:25 |
 K900 | Loongarch is compatible with MIPS64 | 12:03:54 |
| dramforever | the extra step is the chinese company has control over the whole thing now | 12:03:54 |
| K900 | (though they'll never admit it) | 12:03:59 |
| dramforever | rather than licensing it from whoever else | 12:04:01 |
| K900 | I think they have some things on top now | 12:04:06 |
| emily | fair warning I am removing lib.systems.platforms.fuloong2f_n32 | 12:04:25 |
| emily | but it was broken anyway | 12:04:28 |
| emily | you shouldn't need it if you build a more normal system | 12:04:35 |
| dramforever | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
Loongarch is compatible with MIPS64 source? compatible in what sense? | 12:04:42 |
| emily | fwiw K900's statements match what I heard | 12:04:54 |
| emily | that LoongArch just decided to fork MIPS | 12:05:04 |
| dramforever | i've never been able to track down a source on "compatible" | 12:05:27 |
