!FBuJyWXTGcGtHTPphC:nixos.org

Nix Rust

670 Members
Rust151 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
25 Mar 2025
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI don't think that's strictly mandatory though, stuff breaks in Nixpkgs with less handholding than that 🫠14:02:05
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily

I would suggest that after we drop kubernix we

  1. flip useFetchCargoVendor to true by default, add an assertion that it's not false
  2. rip out the old fetching machinery entirely
  3. document that in the release notes
14:02:49
@tomasajt:matrix.orgTomakubernix uses importCargoLock, no need to wait for that14:03:39
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyfair enough14:03:52
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywe should probably drop it anyway though…14:03:55
@tomasajt:matrix.orgTomayeh14:03:59
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily like it looks pretty knownVulnerabilities, it pins Kubernetes components from over half a decade ago 14:04:11
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily does importCargoLock handle the "same package from two different registries" thing btw? 14:04:48
@tomasajt:matrix.orgTomaI don't think so14:04:56
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily I am wondering if it makes sense to allow fetchCargoVendor to be driven by a Cargo.lock to avoid maintaining two paths for all of this altogether. but that's not release-blocking 14:07:20
@tomasajt:matrix.orgTomaafter my last few migrations to fetchCargoVendor get merged, almost all other packages that still have a Cargo.lock vendored do it because of upstream not publishing it14:07:29
@tomasajt:matrix.orgTomanot sure I understand14:08:08
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily we could have a mode where you supply a Cargo.lock and a hash, right? 14:08:38
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily which would meet the "no upstream Cargo.lock" use case and ~obsolete importCargoLock 14:08:53
@tomasajt:matrix.orgTomaI guess very much like with fetchYarnDeps14:09:44
@tomasajt:matrix.orgToma but for historical reasons almost everyone uses ${src}/yarn.lock instead of inherit src there (it's not IFD, since it only uses that in the build process) 14:10:37
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/15f3d37c73c8c1090f8fef7b8508675c9260eab6/pkgs/build-support/rust/import-cargo-lock.nix

  • https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/15f3d37c73c8c1090f8fef7b8508675c9260eab6/pkgs/build-support/rust/replace-workspace-values.py

isn't a trivial maintenance burden, so if 25.05 is doing breaking changes anyway, it might be best to eliminate it

14:11:05
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily * https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/15f3d37c73c8c1090f8fef7b8508675c9260eab6/pkgs/build-support/rust/import-cargo-lock.nix + https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/15f3d37c73c8c1090f8fef7b8508675c9260eab6/pkgs/build-support/rust/replace-workspace-values.py isn't a trivial maintenance burden, so if 25.05 is doing breaking changes anyway, it might be best to eliminate it 14:11:09
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily ah I guess we use the latter in fetchCargoVendor too 14:11:34
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyso it's not so bad14:11:35

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6