| 4 Jul 2021 |
 Rick (Mindavi) | Which leads to some discussion since PGO does help quite a bit | 11:59:44 |
 davidak | >The NixOS Linux distribution pulled off a technical and publicity coup this month by announcing that the ISO_minimal.x86_64-Linux image is 100% reproducible. The announcement was widely discussed on Hacker News, where the article has received in excess of 200 comments.
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-06/ | 16:44:32 |
 andi- | Is it just me or is that worded a bit odd? | 17:49:27 |
 bryan | It's unnatural English, if that's what you mean. :) Maybe not written by a native speaker? | 17:50:59 |
| andi- | The publicity coup is what sound a bit negative to me. | 17:51:26 |
| Rick (Mindavi) | It's good that we're on the list :) | 17:57:49 |
| Rick (Mindavi) | *newsletter | 17:58:04 |
 tomberek | The wording does sound a bit odd. I’m not sure what kind of relationship there is between the org and Nix community. | 18:16:25 |
 幸猫 (𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒/𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗆) | In reply to @tomberek:matrix.org
The wording does sound a bit odd. I’m not sure what kind of relationship there is between the org and Nix community. I first heard about this when grahamc announced it on #reproducible-builds on oftc. | 18:30:55 |
 Foxboron | I think lamby wrote it because raboof didn't get time? It's well intentioned I assure you :) | 18:31:21 |
| tomberek | Who runs the infra for r13y? I’d love to start expanding the package sets reported. It provides a nice way to focus community efforts. | 19:22:21 |
| tomberek | Answering my own question: looks like it’s grahamc. https://github.com/grahamc/r13y.com | 19:24:13 |
| 5 Jul 2021 |
 atemu12 | Redacted or Malformed Event | 08:50:39 |
| atemu12 | tomberek: It already tries to verify the GNOME ISO too but it runs out of space currently: https://github.com/grahamc/r13y.com/issues/28 | 08:52:07 |
| atemu12 | A Hydra job like Jonas Chevalier suggested would probably be a better solution all-together | 08:53:37 |
|  spacesbot - keeps a log of public NixOS channels joined the room. | 19:19:25 |
| spacesbot - keeps a log of public NixOS channels | 19:49:32 |
| 6 Jul 2021 |
|  nurelin joined the room. | 11:41:55 |
|  7c6f434c left the room. | 15:49:10 |
| 幸猫 (𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒/𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗆) changed their display name from 幸猫 to 幸猫 (they/them). | 18:58:17 |
| 幸猫 (𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒/𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗆) changed their display name from 幸猫 (they/them) to 幸猫 (𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦/𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚). | 19:11:06 |
| spacesbot - keeps a log of public NixOS channels changed their display name from spacesbot to spacesbot - keeps a log of public NixOS channels. | 22:11:38 |
| 幸猫 (𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒/𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗆) changed their display name from 幸猫 (𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦/𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚) to 幸猫 (𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒/𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗆). | 22:40:31 |
| 7 Jul 2021 |
|  stefandeml joined the room. | 08:25:46 |
| tomberek | I'm running some tests of r13y locally and will try to work my way up to running the graphical ISO. | 19:39:08 |
| 9 Jul 2021 |
| tomberek | iso_minimal works. running gnome, hoping to avoid the disk space problem.... | 01:21:14 |
| davidak | tomberek i asked myself if the iso file is actually reproducible. is that checked? | 02:55:25 |
 raboof | In reply to @davidak:matrix.org
tomberek i asked myself if the iso file is actually reproducible. is that checked? I have tried building the iso from different old NixOS images, IIRC they were indeed identical among themselves (so in that sense you could say it is 'actually reproducible'), but comparing to the iso's published on the website I ran into https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/125380 | 07:22:14 |
 siraben | Is there a way to override stdenv when I build the ISO? | 11:38:06 |
|  vika (she/her) 🏳️⚧️ set a profile picture. | 16:38:46 |
