| 3 Mar 2025 |
 Cobalt | Afaict, mostly lack of contributions. There is also a limited need to include (client side) libraries because most derivations use a fetcher for the JS dependencies and don't rely on other packages. | 16:03:47 |
 magic_rb | Id add that JS ecosystem is notoriously hard to package purely and i get PTSD every time someone asks me to touch anything javascript | 16:07:49 |
 emily | probably you are looking at nodePackages which is deprecated? | 16:32:25 |
 Marie | there's not really a reason to do that, you would be just reinventing npm | 16:34:34 |
| magic_rb | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
probably you are looking at nodePackages which is deprecated? Is it deprecated now? Do we now package things purely by FOD? | 17:03:28 |
| emily | yes | 17:03:42 |
| magic_rb | Damn, i get it, but kinda sucks :( | 17:04:09 |
| 4 Mar 2025 |
 eyJhb | The fix was this https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/385221#issuecomment-2689389743 , it was a .gitignore file that was the issue in the end. | 12:32:36 |
| eyJhb | Just weird that it's only now, that it became a issue. Because that line has been there forever. | 12:33:53 |
|  lassulus changed their profile picture. | 17:48:54 |
| 6 Mar 2025 |
 João Moreira | In reply to @magic_rb:matrix.redalder.org
Is it deprecated now? Do we now package things purely by FOD? many/all modern ecosystems in Nixpkgs are only really feasible with FODs. Until someone proves the contrary. I also dislike it, but that's what we have. | 04:24:32 |
| João Moreira | That's one of the reasons that I find Nix is far from optimal as a local development environment. | 04:26:38 |
| João Moreira | * That's one of the reasons that I find Nix is far from optimal as a local development environment other than just a simple devshell. | 04:28:12 |
| João Moreira | Guix people totally discard FOD on their official repos. I'm not sure if non-guix people embraced FODs. | 04:30:42 |
| João Moreira | * Guix people totally discard FODs on their official repos. I'm not sure if non-guix people embraced FODs. | 04:30:55 |
| João Moreira | * Guix totally discards FODs on their official repos. I'm not sure if non-guix people embraced FODs. | 04:31:14 |
| João Moreira | * Guix totally discards FODs on their official repos. I'm not sure if nonguix people embraced FODs. | 04:32:00 |
| magic_rb | In reply to @joaomoreira:matrix.org
many/all modern ecosystems in Nixpkgs are only really feasible with FODs. Until someone proves the contrary. I also dislike it, but that's what we have. Oh i know and agree. But still make me sad :( | 05:33:49 |
| 7 Mar 2025 |
|  Qyriad changed their display name from Qyriad to qyriad. | 16:44:27 |
| 8 Mar 2025 |
| Qyriad changed their display name from qyriad to Qyriad. | 21:41:03 |
| 11 Mar 2025 |
|  avocadoom changed their profile picture. | 16:36:23 |
| 20 Mar 2025 |
|  I use NixOS btw set a profile picture. | 08:17:25 |
| I use NixOS btw changed their profile picture. | 08:17:57 |
| I use NixOS btw changed their display name from ahbk to I use NixOS btw. | 16:16:22 |
| 25 Mar 2025 |
| Marie changed their display name from Marie to Marie Ramlow. | 17:42:27 |
| Marie changed their display name from Marie Ramlow to Marie. | 17:44:54 |
| 26 Mar 2025 |
 hexa | do we have a prefetcher for pnpm? | 20:43:36 |
| hexa | asking for one out of date discourse, which we run on discourse.nixos.org | 20:45:34 |
| hexa | hm, enoscrumplex | 20:48:13 |
| hexa | nix-repl> :b pnpm_9.fetchDeps { pname = "discourse"; src = /tmp/discourse; hash = ""; }
warning: found empty hash, assuming 'sha256-AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA='
error: build of '/nix/store/i96hrd6k8k1d1kjccpkp9sqfdm1xwvlr-discourse-pnpm-deps.drv' on 'ssh://hexa@build1.darmstadt.ccc.de' failed: builder for '/nix/store/i96hrd6k8k1d1kjccpkp9sqfdm1xwvlr-discourse-pnpm-deps.drv' failed with exit code 1;
last 8 log lines:
> Running phase: unpackPhase
> unpacking source archive /nix/store/9vkknlvpk9k2r13k1pa7xxfbnr8a7xrm-discourse
> source root is discourse
> Running phase: patchPhase
> Running phase: updateAutotoolsGnuConfigScriptsPhase
> Running phase: installPhase
> yq: Error running jq: ScannerError: mapping values are not allowed in this context
> in "pnpm-lock.yaml", line 209, column 75.
For full logs, run 'nix log /nix/store/i96hrd6k8k1d1kjccpkp9sqfdm1xwvlr-discourse-pnpm-deps.drv'.
| 20:56:43 |
