| 29 Jun 2023 |
 @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
Was boot.initrd.systemd.users and stuff specifically supposed to be left hidden ElvishJerricco? I never had an opinion on that... | 20:26:47 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | It's certainly kind of an internal thing | 20:26:54 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | but also feasible that people would need it | 20:26:59 |
 @lily:lily.flowers | I'll unhide it then I suppose. It's not like we hide other internal please-do-not-change-unless-you-know-what-you-are-doing options | 20:27:38 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | we actually do though | 20:27:52 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | (well mostly ... there are a few. We really don't have a policy on it afaik) | 20:27:53 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | there are plenty of options marked "internal" | 20:27:58 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | Yeah, but these are visible = false | 20:28:06 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | Does internal = true also imply "pls no show in manual"? | 20:28:38 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | I believe so. Most of those are like module-internal rather than bad-idea-but-you-can-mess-with-it-if-you-want internal | 20:29:01 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | gotcha | 20:29:12 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | alright cool | 20:29:14 |
