| 29 Sep 2023 |
 hexa | pick https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/025ca8a3e1561a0b482082d4e06f9b7386923880 | 05:08:11 |
 K900 ⚡️ | And then do a PR to shove it in there | 05:08:14 |
| hexa | because I dropped it | 05:08:17 |
| K900 ⚡️ | I will when I'm done clicking the backport button | 05:08:29 |
| hexa | libvpx bump merged to release-23.05/master and firefox bumps as well | 05:09:44 |
| hexa | triggerd all necessary evals | 05:09:56 |
| hexa | getting some sleep now. | 05:10:01 |
| hexa | 7 am, cool. | 05:10:07 |
| K900 ⚡️ | Sheesh | 05:10:21 |
| K900 ⚡️ | I'll get the Firefox stuff then | 05:10:26 |
| hexa | not so worried about beta/devedition | 05:10:38 |
| K900 ⚡️ | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/257980 | 06:06:00 |
| K900 ⚡️ | This should be good | 06:06:08 |
| K900 ⚡️ | And we'll need to backport it to 23.05 | 06:06:12 |
 vcunat | I thought all is on 23.05 except the firefox-beta-bin update, but somehow it still segfaults for me. | 08:34:40 |
| vcunat | Oh, my bad. | 08:36:57 |
| vcunat | I forgot to fetch the latest git updates 🤦 | 08:38:28 |
| vcunat | I see noone opens it, so:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/257999 | 08:45:20 |
| K900 ⚡️ | https://github.com/mozilla/nixpkgs-mozilla/pull/324 | 09:02:45 |
| K900 ⚡️ | PR for nixpkgs-mozilla to remove the duplicate patchelf hack | 09:02:55 |
| K900 ⚡️ | But first we need the channels to update | 09:03:05 |
| vcunat | unstable-small is already activating, but the big ones will take time. Hopefully by tomorrow. | 09:32:09 |
| vcunat | * ~unstable-small is already activating, but~ the big ones will take time. Hopefully by tomorrow. | 09:34:29 |
| vcunat | * ~~unstable-small is already activating, but~~ the big ones will take time. Hopefully by tomorrow. | 09:34:34 |
| vcunat | * unstable-small is already activating, but the big ones will take time. Hopefully by tomorrow. | 09:34:44 |
| vcunat | Ah, the current evals missed what's needed here, so... hopefully this weekend. | 09:35:50 |
| K900 ⚡️ | It's no rush | 09:36:14 |
| K900 ⚡️ | It should be fine with seeing the argument twice, weirdly enough | 09:36:22 |
| vcunat | I think that's normal for enable/disable arguments. | 09:40:08 |
| K900 ⚡️ | Depends a lot on the software IME | 09:52:50 |
