!PbtOpdWBSRFbEZRLIf:numtide.com

Nix Community Projects

660 Members
Meta discussions related to https://nix-community.org. (For project specific discussions use github issues or projects own matrix channel). Need help from an admin? Open an issue on https://github.com/nix-community/infra/issues166 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
26 Aug 2021
@timdeh:matrix.orgnrdxpI have that one in the picture there16:52:49
@timdeh:matrix.orgnrdxpIt works well16:52:51
@andi:kack.it@andi:kack.itWhat are the specs of build01?16:52:51
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas ChevalierAMD Ryzen 7 1700X Eight-Core Processor16:53:18
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas Chevalier64GB RAM16:53:30
@0x4a6f:matrix.org[0x4A6F]https://github.com/nix-community/infra#build01-16:53:34
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas Chevaliermaybe we should start our own opencollective16:55:13
@ryantm:matrix.orgryantmYubikey ordered 5 NFC ordered!16:56:01
@ryantm:matrix.orgryantm * Yubikey 5 NFC ordered!16:56:07
@andi:kack.it@andi:kack.itIs there enough demand for x86_64-linux capacity? For darwin and aarch64 I can understand that there is demand (but I wouldn't donate if the money goes towards apple).16:57:09
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas Chevalierhttps://github.com/nix-community/infra/issues/10016:59:53
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas ChevalierI think darwin is a bit of a dead end17:00:17
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas Chevalierfor a while it was possible to run darwin in a VM, on a Hetzner box17:00:42
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas Chevalierit's pretty easy to do so17:00:51
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas Chevalierthe aarch64 and T2 changes are going to make that harder17:01:07
@andi:kack.it@andi:kack.itbut not really legal :)17:01:13
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas Chevalierdepends on the country17:01:27
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas Chevalierare EULA enforceable in Germany? :)17:01:45
@andi:kack.it@andi:kack.itI don't know. I avoid apple as much as possible. They are parasites and don't deserve free work.,17:02:06
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas ChevalierI feel the same for most cloud providers17:02:53
@sandro:supersandro.deSandroAs long as we can ignore Darwin build failures on most PRs I don't care to much17:27:13
@sandro:supersandro.deSandroEspecially for some leaf packages some Darwin user needs to speak up and fix it or provide a patch or a failed test at least17:27:49
@sandro:supersandro.deSandroAnd for x86_64-linux: I can't really speak because I have enough build power right now.17:28:24
@ryantm:matrix.orgryantmI think the 60 euro per month server I have is enough for r-ryantm. At least until I do more work to parallelize updates.17:29:24
@ryantm:matrix.orgryantm * I think the 60 euro per month server (build02) I have is enough for r-ryantm. At least until I do more work to parallelize updates.17:33:36
@andi:kack.it@andi:kack.itSome intelligent build scheduling across the machines (self-hostable nixbuild.net?) would be lovely for that work. Of course you can add all the machines to all the other machines as remote builders but that isn't really that great in my experience.17:44:54
@andi:kack.it@andi:kack.it ryantm: hows does r-ryantm work? Does it go one package at a time and waits for the builds to finish? 17:45:19
@ryantm:matrix.orgryantm andi-: Currently it has three sources Repology, GitHub releases, PyPi. Whenever it starts a new batch, it queries those and makes a big list of stuff to work on, then it goes through the list one at a time. Builds are usually not the slowest thing. The slowest things are nixpkgs-review and figuring out how many rebuilds a change causes. 17:58:12
@ryantm:matrix.orgryantmRecently, I just made it run those three sources in parallel.17:58:38
@ryantm:matrix.orgryantmI have lots of ideas for how to make that better, its just a matter of having the time for it.17:59:56

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6