!QhvgabMQzwEQeWehhZ:lossy.network

NixOS Home Automation

495 Members
Declarative Home Automation and other Sidequests | https://wiki.nixos.org/wiki/Home_Assistant127 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
27 Jun 2021
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkthanks!16:43:22
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.network dotlambda: if you are in good standing, sure try and make that upstream pr. 21:02:35
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda
In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
dotlambda: if you are in good standing, sure try and make that upstream pr.
I'd rather not, given that I'd have to set up some environment to run their gen_requirements_all.py.
21:27:00
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.network
{ pkgs ? import <nixpkgs> {} }:
pkgs.mkShell {
  nativeBuildInputs = with pkgs; [
    bashInteractive
    pkg-config
    autoreconfHook
    python3.pkgs.setuptools
    python3
    libxslt
    doxygen
    graphviz
  ];
  # fix homeassistant-pyozw build
  NIX_CFLAGS_COMPILE = [ "-Wno-error=format-security" ];
  buildInputs = with pkgs; [
    libxml2
    openssl
    libxslt
    libffi
    udev
    zlib
    ffmpeg
  ];
}
21:27:33
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkpretty sure mic came up with that21:27:54
@robert:funklause.dedotlambdaBut it imports `homeassistant`21:31:16
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkokay :321:36:31
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkrip21:36:33
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.network docker cough 21:36:41
@robert:funklause.dedotlambdahttps://github.com/home-assistant/core/pull/5223122:01:30
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda I ended up just using nix-shell -A home-assistant. Could have tried that earlier :D 22:02:05
28 Jun 2021
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda
In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
if it is built by ofborg it is probably cached, when the tests run
It is not because the module overrides extraComponents. I made a PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/128501
12:38:33
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkagreed12:39:30
@joerg:bethselamin.deMic92 (Old)What is the current coverage of supported modules in percent?12:57:59
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.network71%12:58:22
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.network
712 / 994 components supported, i.e. 71.63%
12:58:59
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda Mic92: Why are you asking? 14:05:17
@joerg:bethselamin.deMic92 (Old)Just curiosity. I saw you guys opening so many PRs.. 14:05:57
@robert:funklause.dedotlambdaIt's up from <65% less than two weeks ago I think.14:07:21
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkyep15:05:14
@robert:funklause.dedotlambdaThough that number is somewhat deceiving: Only 64% of all components' requirements are satisfied.15:16:25
@robert:funklause.dedotlambdacause there are some components that don't have any requirements15:18:13
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda
In reply to @robert:funklause.de
Though that number is somewhat deceiving: Only 64% of all components' requirements are satisfied.
meaning that we only packaged 64% of the stuff required to support all components
15:18:36
29 Jun 2021
@noah:matrix.chatsubo.cafeChurchHmm is there a package for hass_frontend yet?01:16:59
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.network Church: it is in pkgs/servers/home-assistant/frontend.nix and directly callPackage'd from home-assistants derivation 02:43:31
@noah:matrix.chatsubo.cafeChurchOdd running nixpkgs-unstable and that's not there...02:44:05
@noah:matrix.chatsubo.cafeChurchI am overriding the package def a bit02:44:11
@noah:matrix.chatsubo.cafeChurchThat might be why02:44:13
@noah:matrix.chatsubo.cafeChurchAdding extra packages mainly02:44:24
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkheh02:45:31

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6