!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

360 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/114 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
22 Apr 2026
@k900:0upti.meK900Running a build15:30:04
@k900:0upti.meK900Yaaaaaay15:39:53
@k900:0upti.meK900nixos-rebuild-ng is broken on staging-nixos15:39:59
@k900:0upti.meK900
┃        > FAILED tests/test_nix.py::test_upgrade_channels - AssertionError: Calls not found.
┃        > Expected: [call(['nix-channel', '--update', 'nixos-hardware'], check=False, sudo=True),
┃        >  call(['nix-channel', '--update', 'nixos'], check=False, sudo=True)]
┃        >   Actual: [call(['nix-channel', '--update', 'nixos'], check=False, sudo=True),
┃        >  call(['nix-channel', '--update', 'nixos-hardware'], check=False, sudo=True)]
15:40:17
@k900:0upti.meK900OK, pushed a fix15:49:40
@k900:0upti.meK900Going to finish building this kernel and then send it15:50:14
@k900:0upti.meK900staging-nixos merge queued16:09:15
@k900:0upti.meK900Merged, unstable-small booped, unstable-large boop in progress16:24:38
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahow do we feel about trying out the new queue-runner tonight?17:47:27
@k900:0upti.meK900Fuck no lmao17:48:17
@k900:0upti.meK900Not on staging merge day17:48:21
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa
Download
18:04:51
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahonestly, this is a function of when I have energy and time to spare :p18:09:44
@k900:0upti.meK900I mean18:12:18
@k900:0upti.meK900How long do you want to be around for after this :P18:12:23
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaa few hours at least :)18:19:23
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaok, everything prepared20:08:07
@hexa:lossy.networkhexawill postpone until tomrrow evening ig20:08:12
23 Apr 2026
@tfc:matrix.orgtfc

vcunat: regarding this PR:

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/510385

the fix will be to use hostPkgs.writeText instead of pkgs.writeText. i am going to create a PR to fix that. i am however a bit confused why this is blocking nixpkgs-unstable when i don't see the testdriver-config change. does "is blocking the nixpkgs-unstable channel" mean that this blocks the changes from going into nixpkgs-unstable branch?

i guess i would still open the PR normally against staging-nixos is that right?

08:24:19
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat It fails the release-checks job which is critical for that channel (but it's confusing, as multiple issues were there recently). It only affects cases when darwin is included, so the Linux-only channels are not affected fortunately (which is why it took longer to notice, too). 08:27:19
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatWill the fix rebuild many NixOS tests?08:28:01
@tfc:matrix.orgtfconly on macos if we even build them there08:28:18
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat Ideally we'd merge it sooner than through staging-nixos. 08:28:18
@tfc:matrix.orgtfcon linux hostPkgs == pkgs so i think no derivation will change08:28:31
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat OK, then we should target master with this. 08:28:42
@tfc:matrix.orgtfci will ping you once the PR is open. takes a bit to download everything on the mac, don't have too fast internet this week08:29:24
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatI can run it on a decent machine locally, say if you open a draft PR.08:35:03
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat

[queue-runner] will postpone until tomrrow evening ig

Maybe we'll even have post-staging* nixos-unstable by then. All blockers have passed, so it's mostly just a matter of Hydra crunching through those thousands of NixOS tests.

08:39:19
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat *

[queue-runner] will postpone until tomrrow evening ig

Maybe we'll even have post-staging* nixos-unstable by then. All blockers have passed, so it's mostly just a matter of Hydra crunching through those thousands of NixOS tests (but 24h is roughly the time required for that).

08:39:45
@tfc:matrix.orgtfc vcunat: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/512733 09:57:13

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6