!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

346 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/114 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
26 Sep 2021
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát unstable-small has it already. 17:38:30
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)

Reviewing the diffs, we have:

bumps for:

  • imagemagick
  • eigen
  • mandoc
  • python3.sqlalchemy
  • gd (to 2.3.2)
  • texinfo
  • linuxHeaders
  • pcre2
  • gdb
  • xmrig
  • libva
  • valgrind

as well as:

  • imagemagick JPEG XL build option
  • mandoc fixes
  • llvm_5 fixes
  • xcbuild build fix
  • {cc,binutils}-wrapper fixes
  • autoPatchelfHook fixups
  • mesa OpenCL support
  • qt5 deps
17:42:27
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát The staging builds on Hydra were unblocked today, so it should be possible. 17:55:57
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/13955417:56:14
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.dedas_j joined the room.18:20:39
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.dedas_j changed their display name from Janne Heß to das_j.18:21:35
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsternihm the eval from yesterday still has 32000 queued build? these are still the aarch64-darwin build, probably?18:49:47
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)yeah18:49:58
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him) hey das_j, was wondering if you were about 18:50:05
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)wanted to try to minimize the changes that would land alongside the coreutils bump, although... it shouldn't be too disruptive?18:51:17
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.dedas_jIt looks like it's less disruptive than I was initially expecting. Maybe Darwin will give me trouble, I'm currently trying to build stdenv18:52:14
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.dedas_jMy *-linux builds are about halfway through now without any problems so if problems should come up, they will probably not be in the -small set18:53:15
27 Sep 2021
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát
In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.org
hm the eval from yesterday still has 32000 queued build? these are still the aarch64-darwin build, probably?
I usually click the eval and put the name of the platform into the eval box. It's all darwin but 18:12 for x86:aarch.
05:50:03
@j-k:matrix.orgj-kWhen does staging merge into staging-next? Is there an open PR somewhere?10:18:15
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátWe don't do PRs for that.10:18:47
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát The merge happens manually and then the resulting staging-next gets a PR against master. 10:19:11
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát * The merge happens "silently" and then the resulting staging-next gets a PR against master. 10:19:27
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát * The merge happens "silently" and then the resulting staging-next gets a PR against master. (the last link above is the current one) 10:20:17
@trofi:matrix.orgtrofiIs it a fast-forward most of the time?16:34:03
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát I think nowadays usually people don't use --no-ff when merging staging into staging-next, and it tends to be fast-forward. 16:39:06
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát As for staging-next to master, there I'd dislike a fast-forward merge. 16:39:57
28 Sep 2021
@happysalada:matrix.orghappysaladaIt's a littlle odd at the moment, staging-next is a priority but the unstable build has a lower priority and so the last staging-next changes haven't made it onto unstable yet23:09:48
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)I think that's mostly down to the fact that unstable is broken23:27:07
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)so the channel won't advance23:27:17
29 Sep 2021
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát trunk-combined jobset has a bit less "build shares" configuration than staging-next (one third, roughly). I agree it would be better to reverse their order. 05:47:02
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát trunk has more shares than the other two (which helps trunk-combined except for NixOS stuff, i.e. mainlytests). 05:48:21
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát By the way, there's been lots of work scheduled in the past few days, so I wasn't running into adding more so far, e.g. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/139514#issuecomment-927260195
I suppose we'll also want a staging-21.05 iteration soon, too, as we have more than week-old pushes in there with CVEs.
05:52:58
@happysalada:matrix.orghappysaladano problem at all, I'm still getting feedback on it. I've tested building chromium and it works fine, so hopefully it should be fairly ready to merge.10:01:02
@happysalada:matrix.orghappysalada
In reply to @lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninja
so the channel won't advance
the channel seems broken just because of cancel buids (It seems). It looks like the channel is a little starved, just like vladimir was saying
10:02:28
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)It'd be quite nice if we could update the topic of the room to mention the latest PR...12:01:37

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6