| 14 Apr 2026 |
vcunat | Do I see right this amount?
Rebuild: linux 521, darwin 497
| 16:27:20 |
| klea (she/her) changed their display name from klea to klea (she/her). | 16:27:22 |
vcunat | For security issues I'd say you could even go directly to master. | 16:27:34 |
vcunat | I assume most of that are relatively cheap plugins. | 16:27:59 |
vcunat | * I assume most of that are relatively cheap plugins, too. | 16:28:10 |
klea (she/her) | I believe yes. | 16:28:28 |
vcunat | * For security issues I'd say you could even go directly to master with such rebuild amount. | 16:28:30 |
klea (she/her) | Ack, will do a PR. | 16:28:38 |
klea (she/her) | Done. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/510019 | 16:36:20 |
| tfc joined the room. | 17:31:58 |
tfc | hello! quick question: we merged this test driver change to staging (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/509654), although it should have gone to staging-nixos.
now there are some other pull requests that depend on this and should also go to staging-nixos, so it's a bit annoying that i chose the wrong branch for the first one.
what to do with this ideally? revert in staging and re-open PR based on staging-nixos?
| 17:33:34 |
K900 | No need to revert | 17:41:02 |
tfc | i don't completely understand the staging dynamics across the different branches. shall we then base the upcoming PRs on staging then, too? | 18:42:04 |
K900 | No | 18:55:05 |
K900 | Just merge to staging-nixos | 18:55:09 |
tfc | But new prs will not see the change that we have now in staging, or am i wrong? The next prs depend on that | 19:30:45 |
Ramses 🇵🇸 | You can duplicate the commit in staging-nixos, and git will figure that out later when staging-nixos gets merged into master and then into staging | 19:33:15 |
emily | git cherry-pick -x like it's a backport | 19:34:09 |
Ramses 🇵🇸 | It should just skip it | 19:33:57 |
tfc | Perfect, thank you for the explanation | 19:56:34 |
| 15 Apr 2026 |
vcunat | 🤔 I didn't think xorgserver would be such a large rebuild.
Rebuild: linux 18610, darwin 22
| 05:40:25 |
vcunat | * 🤔 I didn't think xorg-server would be such a large rebuild.
Rebuild: linux 18610, darwin 22
| 05:51:29 |
vcunat | Ah right, without xvfb it | 06:07:54 |
vcunat | * Ah right, without xvfb it's just
Rebuild: linux 231, darwin 4
| 06:07:59 |
vcunat | Context: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/510184 | 06:08:48 |
| 16 Apr 2026 |
Ainz Ooal Gown | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/510522
@vcunat:matrix.org could you try running the passthru tests, it seems to hang on me on the nix community builder
| 15:58:36 |
vcunat | Not now. In 14 hours perhaps. | 16:59:36 |
| 17 Apr 2026 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] changed their profile picture. | 16:58:37 |
Austin Horstman | should https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/510964 target staging or staging-next... sorry. out of the loop on staging cycles. | 19:22:05 |
K900 | staging-next | 19:39:37 |