| 22 Apr 2026 |
 raitobezarius | if Lix can produce a result here out of maximal laziness… :P | 12:56:55 |
| raitobezarius | * if Lix can produce a (correct) result here out of maximal laziness… :P | 12:57:13 |
| raitobezarius | you can follow our discussions in https://zulip.lix.systems/#narrow/channel/6-Eval/topic/Laziness.20difference.20in.20Lix.202.2E94.2B.20vs.2E.20Lix.202.2E93/near/9924 | 12:59:34 |
| * raitobezarius goes away | 13:00:24 |
 Randy Eckenrode | I added a test for __bootPackages in my attempted fix PR. Once we get a fix in, then this can all go away on staging where I tear out this stuff that was only there to avoid rebuilds on master. | 13:07:29 |
| raitobezarius | Awesome, tysm! | 13:07:39 |
 emily | it would be nice to have a more minimal reproducer so it can be analysed as a language semantics question rather than a Nixpkgs constructs one | 13:16:44 |
| emily | (ofc not saying anyone is obligated to produce that) | 13:16:52 |
 vcunat | Merged staging-next. While the release-checks` on master suffers from multiple non-linux issues, it seems unrelated. | 13:23:47 |
| vcunat | * Merged staging-next. While the release-checks on master suffers from multiple non-linux issues, it seems unrelated. | 13:23:58 |
 K900 | @vcunat hold off on evals maybe | 13:35:49 |
| K900 | We have stable kernels | 13:35:56 |
| K900 | I can do a PR in a bit | 13:37:02 |
| vcunat | It's possible I guess. | 13:47:28 |
| vcunat | I pulled staging-nixos a couple hours ago and whole -small jobset had passed already. | 13:47:51 |
| vcunat | * I pulled staging-nixos a couple hours ago and whole -small jobset had passed already. (so that's cached) | 13:47:58 |
| vcunat | The extra delay from doing it all again won't be large. | 13:48:27 |
| vcunat | If you want it there, open and merge it soon. | 15:06:42 |
| K900 | Still waiting for kernel doot org to produce tarballs | 15:07:37 |
| vcunat | I see today's tarballs now, for some kernels at least. | 15:29:36 |
| K900 | Yeah me too | 15:30:03 |
| K900 | Running a build | 15:30:04 |
| K900 | Yaaaaaay | 15:39:53 |
| K900 | nixos-rebuild-ng is broken on staging-nixos | 15:39:59 |
| K900 | ┃ > FAILED tests/test_nix.py::test_upgrade_channels - AssertionError: Calls not found.
┃ > Expected: [call(['nix-channel', '--update', 'nixos-hardware'], check=False, sudo=True),
┃ > call(['nix-channel', '--update', 'nixos'], check=False, sudo=True)]
┃ > Actual: [call(['nix-channel', '--update', 'nixos'], check=False, sudo=True),
┃ > call(['nix-channel', '--update', 'nixos-hardware'], check=False, sudo=True)]
| 15:40:17 |
| K900 | OK, pushed a fix | 15:49:40 |
| K900 | Going to finish building this kernel and then send it | 15:50:14 |
| K900 | staging-nixos merge queued | 16:09:15 |
| K900 | Merged, unstable-small booped, unstable-large boop in progress | 16:24:38 |
 hexa | how do we feel about trying out the new queue-runner tonight? | 17:47:27 |
