| 20 Feb 2026 |
 tom | yeah, the patch is pretty straightforward and what boost recommends in their 1.89 release notes → opened https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/492413 | 09:41:06 |
| 21 Feb 2026 |
 Vladimír Čunát | I think of merging staging-next within hours. | 07:00:17 |
 K900 | Are we out of blockers then? | 08:24:17 |
| Vladimír Čunát | -small is green now: https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1823052 | 08:31:52 |
| Vladimír Čunát | mariadb.x86_64-darwin would block nixpkgs-unstable though | 08:32:13 |
| Vladimír Čunát | (noticed since my last post) | 08:32:26 |
| Vladimír Čunát | But it looks like just some missing includes. | 08:33:13 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * But it looks like just some missing C #includes. | 08:33:33 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * But it looks like just some missing C #include. | 08:33:35 |
 kirillrdy | tiny PR, non blocker, https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/492701 | 08:38:36 |
| Vladimír Čunát | But it's not a staging* regression. Failing on nixpkgs master already:
https://hydra.nixos.org/build/322012946 | 08:58:46 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Blaming bf4c79846d7c | 09:02:39 |
| Vladimír Čunát | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/490780#issuecomment-3938484220 | 09:04:15 |
|  tazjin joined the room. | 10:04:50 |
| Vladimír Čunát |
Are we out of blockers then?
I still see thousands of build regressions just on -linux:
https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1823053?filter=-linux&compare=unstable
| 10:21:50 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I'm not aware of any blockers per se, but it's not a negligible amount. | 10:22:35 |
|  h7x4 changed their profile picture. | 19:25:17 |
| h7x4 changed their profile picture. | 19:30:10 |
| h7x4 changed their profile picture. | 19:33:34 |
| 22 Feb 2026 |
|  Delta joined the room. | 02:54:26 |
 mdaniels5757 | I have a PR (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/492830) against staging-next. It fixes python314Packages.cmd2, which immediately fixes at least couple of packages, and removes one reason that about 50 others fail (even though they continue to fail). But it's 9k linux and 7k darwin rebuilds... Is it mergable at this point? | 03:17:38 |
| mdaniels5757 | * I have a PR (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/492830) against staging-next. It fixes python314Packages.cmd2, which immediately fixes at least a couple of packages, and removes one reason that about 50 others fail (even though they continue to fail). But it's 9k linux and 7k darwin rebuilds... Is it mergable at this point? | 03:18:03 |
| mdaniels5757 | * I have a PR (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/492830) against staging-next. It fixes python314Packages.cmd2, which immediately fixes at least a couple of packages, and removes one reason that about 50 others fail (even though they continue to fail). But it's 9k linux and 7k darwin rebuilds... Is it mergable at this point in the cycle? | 03:18:20 |
| mdaniels5757 | * I have a PR (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/492830) against staging-next. It fixes python314Packages.cmd2, which immediately fixes at least a couple of packages (on each OS), and removes one reason that about 50 other packages (also on each OS, even though they continue to fail). But it's 9k linux and 7k darwin rebuilds... Is it mergable at this point in the cycle? | 03:24:47 |
| mdaniels5757 | * I have a PR (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/492830) against staging-next. It fixes python314Packages.cmd2, which immediately fixes at least a couple of packages (on each OS), and removes one reason that about 50 other packages fail (also on each OS). But it's 9k linux and 7k darwin rebuilds... Is it mergable at this point in the cycle? | 03:28:57 |
|  Amboss_Mann joined the room. | 19:48:19 |
|  mei 🌒& changed their profile picture. | 22:54:26 |
| 23 Feb 2026 |
| Vladimír Čunát | staging-next merged | 12:12:13 |
| Vladimír Čunát |
It's not like I'm satisfied by the regression list, but it doesn't seem that bad anymore, and I don't think that delaying would help significantly.
| 12:12:17 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Thanks for the numerous fixes 🙂 | 12:15:21 |
