!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

337 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.05 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/114 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
7 Jan 2026
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI've used qemu-user a nontrivial number of times in my life but I think almost never to run interactive terminal programs05:12:31
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
sounds like the projected impact shouldn't be world-ending even if we wait for upstream and they're a bit slow at least?
it shouldn't be hard to have users manually overlay qemu with the patches either
08:23:52
8 Jan 2026
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgFabián HerediaI am hopeful that it will be upstreamed within 2 weeks now that several distros have picked it up and the patches have been sent on the correct channel. Only blocker could be authorship/license due to the patches being submitted by someone who isn't the author00:32:50
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgFabián HerediaUnsure about what happened but seems like there were about >50k rebuilds on nixpkgs:unstable from the previous eval to the current eval04:52:39
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgFabián Herediahttps://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixpkgs/unstable04:52:42
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgFabián Herediaimage.png
Download image.png
04:53:01
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgFabián Heredia* Unsure about what happened but seems like there were about ~50k rebuilds on nixpkgs:unstable from the previous eval to the current eval04:53:31
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae) maybe related: some builds i ran on master were trying to build cargo for aarch64-linux, which absolutely should not have needed a rebuild without staging cycle 04:53:40
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae) * maybe related: some builds i ran on master a few hours ago were trying to build cargo for aarch64-linux, which absolutely should not have needed a rebuild without staging cycle 04:54:37
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae) * maybe related: some builds i ran on master a few hours ago were trying to build cargo for aarch64-linux, which absolutely should not have needed a rebuild without a staging cycle. so something deep in the dependency tree changed somehow 04:55:36
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae)looking at hydra, it seems like cargo (probably some dependent?) had a rebuild on every platform besides x86_64-linux05:05:00
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae)https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/472376 probably this PR05:06:15
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgFabián Herediaweird that x86_64-linux would be 0 rebuilds and ofborg/eval also indicates 0 rebuilds 😱05:07:35
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgFabián Herediaimage.png
Download image.png
05:08:23
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgFabián HerediaYeah currently x86_64-linux chilling05:08:31
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae)* https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/472376 maybe this PR?05:10:35
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae)Redacted or Malformed Event05:17:28
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae) * if i'm right and it is that pr, i have a guess at how this happened. i wonder if https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/464707 made this PR become a mass-rebuild (once it reached master with the recent staging-next merge) between the time of the initial CI rebuild calculation/label application and merge time 05:18:23
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae)image.png
Download image.png
05:40:03
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae)Redacted or Malformed Event05:40:12
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae) * i don't fully understand this interaction with RUSTFLAGS but it may also have something to do with https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/464707 05:42:25
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae) *

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/472376 maybe this PR?

EDIT: yep, seems like it

$ nixpkgs-review pr --no-shell --print-result 472376 --systems aarch64-linux -c merge --eval local
-- snip
--------- Impacted packages on 'aarch64-linux' ---------
26438 packages updated:
06:15:07
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae) *

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/472376 maybe this PR?

EDIT: yep, seems like it

$ nixpkgs-review pr --no-shell --print-result 472376 --systems aarch64-linux --checkout merge --eval local
-- snip
--------- Impacted packages on 'aarch64-linux' ---------
26438 packages updated:
06:17:07
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae) *

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/472376 maybe this PR?

EDIT: yep, seems like it

$ nixpkgs-review pr --no-shell --print-result 472376 --systems aarch64-linux --checkout merge --eval local
(output elided)
--------- Impacted packages on 'aarch64-linux' ---------
26438 packages updated:
(output elided)
06:17:27
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI'm cancelling the jobs and notified that PR.06:29:23
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátThanks for finding the difference.06:29:40
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátHydra probably will have spare time for *-linux, by the way. (but the cargo also rebuilds on *-darwin)06:39:41
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát I might get crazy from all the darwin and pythonPackages fallout on staging-next-25.11. 14:30:23
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát nixpkgs-unstable is also blocked for a week now, because of some darwin-only issue, BTW. 14:32:23
@hexa:lossy.networkhexatwisted fails differently than on staging-next 🤔 restarting once more14:34:49

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6