| 15 Dec 2025 |
 K900 | Are we doing master next? | 07:05:12 |
 vcunat | I had been thinking - because now is a rare opportunity when stable and unstable haven't diverged much in terms of rebuilds - that maybe we could first pick the contents of this staging-next-25.11 and merge that pretty quickly into nixpkgs master. Well, perhaps after checking that all of it really was intended for staging/master as well (relatively easy from cherry-pick marks). | 07:27:37 |
| vcunat | But perhaps it's not worth the bother. The main advantage would be security fixes getting at least one week earlier than otherwise. Probably. | 07:28:11 |
| vcunat | * I had been thinking - because now is a rare opportunity when stable and unstable haven't diverged much in terms of rebuilds - that maybe we could first pick the contents of this staging-next-25.11 into staging-next and merge that pretty quickly into nixpkgs master. Well, perhaps after checking that all of it really was intended for staging/master as well (relatively easy from cherry-pick marks). | 07:28:38 |
 Fabián Heredia | Wasn't there a staging-next cycle that wasn't part of 25.11 already performed? | 07:30:19 |
| Fabián Heredia | Ah no that's right the last staging-next cycle is part of 25.11 :O | 07:33:12 |
| Fabián Heredia | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/3dd12c46719c52e75d9f86998de15db82d27a6df | 07:33:14 |
| Fabián Heredia | git log origin/master..origin/staging --grep CVE
Only shows:
- gnutls (low and on 25.11)
- libpng 1.6.51 (highs and on 25.11)
- django_4 (moderate and on 25.11)
- libpng: 1.6.52 (highs and on 25.11)
- xkbcomp (moderates and on 25.11)
- libarchive (no CVEs and not on 25.11)
- glib (highs and not on 25.11)
| 07:42:00 |
| vcunat | There was a 25.05 cycle, so perhaps that's what you mistaked for it. | 07:53:08 |
| vcunat | * There was a 25.05 cycle, so perhaps that's what you mistook for it. | 07:53:22 |
| Fabián Heredia | yeah, just double checked and there hasn't been a staging-next cycle not part of 25.11 | 07:53:55 |
 Yureka (she/her) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/470961 | 08:42:31 |
| Yureka (she/her) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/470962 | 08:44:32 |
| Yureka (she/her) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/470964 | 08:46:34 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | In reply to @yuka:yuka.dev
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/470964 This one looks like an XML parser fail, but we didn't touch libxml2 this time, wtf???? | 08:48:50 |
| K900 | "fuzz" in the name | 08:49:05 |
| K900 | I wonder if they're actually fuzzing it | 08:49:09 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | Oh god | 08:49:18 |
 ghpzin | That is some new python version thing (just linked in issue):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/beautifulsoup/+bug/2134393 | 08:53:16 |
| K900 | Ah | 08:53:43 |
| K900 | Minor Python version updates breaking libraries | 08:53:51 |
| K900 | Must be a day that ends in Y | 08:53:54 |
| ghpzin | * That is some new python version thing (just linked in issue):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/beautifulsoup/+bug/2134393
https://git.launchpad.net/beautifulsoup/commit/?id=55f655ffb7ef03bdd1df0f013743831fe54e3c7a | 08:54:23 |
| vcunat | It's normal for patch-level python3 updates to break some stuff. | 08:59:37 |
| vcunat | Always at least a few tests in python3Packages. | 08:59:51 |
| vcunat | * It's normal for patch-level python3 updates to break some stuff, sadly. | 09:00:04 |
|  Capypara joined the room. | 09:23:27 |
|  Jules Lamur joined the room. | 10:11:33 |
|  Artem Leshchev joined the room. | 18:48:09 |
| Fabián Heredia | Re: short 25.11-analog staging-next for unstable
I think the only high >= severity security fix would be libpng and others would be delayed glib which probably has more usage)
If that short staging-next cycle would be about a couple of days the next staging-next cycle would start around holidays (navidad + new year in my case) and I would rather do any pending gcc fixes before then to have less to think about during winter holidays xd | 19:58:24 |
