!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

361 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/114 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
22 Apr 2026
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI will open an issue on the Lix side and pass it to the rest of the core team12:54:53
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius I suggest that override is repaired and is tested wrt to presence of __bootPackages or that AvailabilityVersions do not assume its existence in stdenv because overridden stdenv exist 12:55:16
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusThis unblocks the current failure in Hydra12:55:32
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius release-checks should add something about .stdenv to the package set being evaluated 12:55:48
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusThis will make Lix flag this also unless we deem it to be a bug on our side and will converge to CppNix's evaluation behaviors12:56:04
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius but if I read https://edolstra.github.io/pubs/laziness-ldta2008-final.pdf 12:56:46
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI read "maximal laziness"12:56:48
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusif Lix can produce a result here out of maximal laziness… :P12:56:55
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius * if Lix can produce a (correct) result here out of maximal laziness… :P 12:57:13
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius you can follow our discussions in https://zulip.lix.systems/#narrow/channel/6-Eval/topic/Laziness.20difference.20in.20Lix.202.2E94.2B.20vs.2E.20Lix.202.2E93/near/9924 12:59:34
* @raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius goes away13:00:24
@reckenrode:matrix.orgRandy Eckenrode I added a test for __bootPackages in my attempted fix PR. Once we get a fix in, then this can all go away on staging where I tear out this stuff that was only there to avoid rebuilds on master. 13:07:29
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusAwesome, tysm!13:07:39
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyit would be nice to have a more minimal reproducer so it can be analysed as a language semantics question rather than a Nixpkgs constructs one13:16:44
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily(ofc not saying anyone is obligated to produce that)13:16:52
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat Merged staging-next. While the release-checks` on master suffers from multiple non-linux issues, it seems unrelated. 13:23:47
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat * Merged staging-next. While the release-checks on master suffers from multiple non-linux issues, it seems unrelated. 13:23:58
@k900:0upti.meK900 @vcunat hold off on evals maybe 13:35:49
@k900:0upti.meK900We have stable kernels13:35:56
@k900:0upti.meK900I can do a PR in a bit13:37:02
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatIt's possible I guess.13:47:28
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat I pulled staging-nixos a couple hours ago and whole -small jobset had passed already. 13:47:51
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat * I pulled staging-nixos a couple hours ago and whole -small jobset had passed already. (so that's cached) 13:47:58
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatThe extra delay from doing it all again won't be large.13:48:27
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatIf you want it there, open and merge it soon.15:06:42
@k900:0upti.meK900Still waiting for kernel doot org to produce tarballs15:07:37
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatI see today's tarballs now, for some kernels at least.15:29:36
@k900:0upti.meK900Yeah me too15:30:03
@k900:0upti.meK900Running a build15:30:04
@k900:0upti.meK900Yaaaaaay15:39:53

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6