| 17 Mar 2026 |
 hexa | * so the current budget is ~300 EUR/mo | 14:45:50 |
| hexa | 
Download image.png | 14:46:25 |
| hexa | cool, the interesting options are all out of stock | 14:46:33 |
| hexa | I stand corrected, that is not the offender | 14:47:07 |
| hexa | ../mitmproxy-rs-*-vendor/aya-build-*/src/lib.rs resolves to nothing | 14:48:14 |
 vcunat | Out of stock and overall the pricing is much higher? | 14:48:55 |
| hexa | kinda, yeah | 14:50:35 |
| hexa | but hetzner doesn't offer any new macs anymore, so we're out of options | 14:50:54 |
| hexa | we could buy them instead | 14:51:09 |
| vcunat | We can't... like attach an SSD over USB, right? 😜 | 14:51:49 |
| vcunat | (don't know what else to do with Apple pricing) | 14:52:04 |
| hexa | m4 10core, 16gb ram, 512gb disk is ~950 EUR/piece | 14:53:10 |
| hexa | 32gb ram? 1450 EUR/piece 🤡 | 14:53:49 |
| hexa | 24gb ram? 1200 EUR/piece | 14:54:07 |
| hexa | the oakhost offer for the 16gb ram model is ~125 EUR/mo | 15:03:26 |
| hexa | that's roughly 7 months until we can buy the thing | 15:03:59 |
| vcunat | Also electricity etc. but it still doesn't feel cheap. | 15:04:22 |
| hexa | nah, what they offer is cool, because it just works very well | 15:04:47 |
| hexa | compared to hetzner and macstadium they have a very reliable remote kvm for example | 15:05:08 |
| hexa | with hosting we trade that in for mdm and remote hands | 15:11:39 |
| hexa | * with hosting those ourselves we trade that in for mdm and remote hands | 15:11:53 |
 Sandro 🐧 | pushed a fix | 15:31:50 |
| Sandro 🐧 | doesn't work because of $out | 15:32:34 |
| Sandro 🐧 | yep, cargo vendor changed | 15:32:35 |
| hexa | patches = [
(replaceVars ./fix-mitmproxy-linux-redirector-path.diff {
mitmproxy-linux-redirector = "${placeholder "out"}/bin/mitmproxy-linux-redirector";
})
];
| 15:32:58 |
| hexa | patches = [
(replaceVars ./fix-mitmproxy-linux-redirector-path.diff {
mitmproxy-linux-redirector = "${placeholder "out"}/bin/mitmproxy-linux-redirector";
})
];
| 15:33:01 |
| Sandro 🐧 | That references the out of the replaceVars derivation, not the mitmproxy derivation IIRC | 15:39:45 |
| hexa | hrm, does it? ok. | 15:42:15 |
| Sandro 🐧 | Yep, it is specific to the derivation it runs in. | 15:47:11 |
| Sandro 🐧 | So it cannot be used in Ferchpatch or so, too | 15:47:21 |
