!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

391 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/127 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
27 Sep 2021
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát * The merge happens "silently" and then the resulting staging-next gets a PR against master. 10:19:27
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát * The merge happens "silently" and then the resulting staging-next gets a PR against master. (the last link above is the current one) 10:20:17
@trofi:matrix.orgtrofiIs it a fast-forward most of the time?16:34:03
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát I think nowadays usually people don't use --no-ff when merging staging into staging-next, and it tends to be fast-forward. 16:39:06
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát As for staging-next to master, there I'd dislike a fast-forward merge. 16:39:57
28 Sep 2021
@happysalada:matrix.orghappysaladaIt's a littlle odd at the moment, staging-next is a priority but the unstable build has a lower priority and so the last staging-next changes haven't made it onto unstable yet23:09:48
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)I think that's mostly down to the fact that unstable is broken23:27:07
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)so the channel won't advance23:27:17
29 Sep 2021
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát trunk-combined jobset has a bit less "build shares" configuration than staging-next (one third, roughly). I agree it would be better to reverse their order. 05:47:02
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát trunk has more shares than the other two (which helps trunk-combined except for NixOS stuff, i.e. mainlytests). 05:48:21
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát By the way, there's been lots of work scheduled in the past few days, so I wasn't running into adding more so far, e.g. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/139514#issuecomment-927260195
I suppose we'll also want a staging-21.05 iteration soon, too, as we have more than week-old pushes in there with CVEs.
05:52:58
@happysalada:matrix.orghappysaladano problem at all, I'm still getting feedback on it. I've tested building chromium and it works fine, so hopefully it should be fairly ready to merge.10:01:02
@happysalada:matrix.orghappysalada
In reply to @lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninja
so the channel won't advance
the channel seems broken just because of cancel buids (It seems). It looks like the channel is a little starved, just like vladimir was saying
10:02:28
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)It'd be quite nice if we could update the topic of the room to mention the latest PR...12:01:37

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6