!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

405 Members
Staging merges | Find currently open staging-next PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%3Aupdated-desc+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-21.05+is%3Aopen132 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
5 Jul 2026
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI mean we can just change the name21:20:05
@k900:0upti.meK900No like21:20:10
@k900:0upti.meK900Generally21:20:11
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyright21:20:20
@scrumplex:duckhub.ioScrumplexI'm OOTL when it comes to cache.nixos.org, but does it deduplicate derivations? Otherwise I would be concerned that invalidating store paths might balloon the cache long term21:20:28
@k900:0upti.meK900The outpath won't chang21:20:43
@k900:0upti.meK900Redacted or Malformed Event21:20:44
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI don't think a one-time payment of all the pnpm FODs should be a big deal21:20:44
@k900:0upti.meK900Also we have like21:20:50
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyit will21:20:48
@k900:0upti.meK900100 pnpm FODs21:20:53
@k900:0upti.meK900Or something21:20:54
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythat's the only way you can invalidate a FOD21:20:56
@k900:0upti.meK900If we change the name yes21:20:59
@k900:0upti.meK900If we make the queue runner force rebuild them no21:21:04
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily okay, but we ought to change the name because downstream users might get their FODs broken by the SQLite update in case our sed isn't good enough 21:21:25
@scrumplex:duckhub.ioScrumplex
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
I don't think a one-time payment of all the pnpm FODs should be a big deal
Ah I thought you meant invalidating store paths going forward. One time should be fine :D
21:21:29
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyi.e. it's not just Hydra even if we ignore the hypothetical nature of changing Hydra here21:22:03
@k900:0upti.meK900Valid21:22:36
@k900:0upti.meK900Fucking hell21:22:39
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilybtw maybe check to see if there's some SQLite flag thing we can set to make it output the old way21:22:58
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyseems like the kind of thing they might have21:23:05
@scrumplex:duckhub.ioScrumplexWhat if we bisect the exact sqlite commit that causes this miniscule change and revert it just for fetchPnpmDeps?21:36:19
@k900:0upti.meK900Disgusting but possible21:39:01
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily I prefer sed over that tbh 21:40:18
@scrumplex:duckhub.ioScrumplex

Only to bridge the gap until we build a custom serializer/deserializer.

We would just have to deprecate fetcherVersion 4 quite quickly though

21:40:19
@k900:0upti.meK900Bisecting anyway21:44:45
@k900:0upti.meK900Maybe we'll find an option21:44:49
@k900:0upti.meK900My favorite part of sqlite is how it builds on one thread21:45:15
@k900:0upti.meK900NOTE TO SELF LOWER CASE IS BAD21:45:57

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6