!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

391 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/125 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
29 Jun 2026
@sempiternal-aurora:matrix.orgMyriaWould this be a gc problem?01:14:33
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatYes, there's been lots of these.05:50:57
@k900:0upti.meK900https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/2548809:10:26
@k900:0upti.meK900Scipy has more weird float precision issues09:10:32
@k900:0upti.meK900Going to skip that test once I confirm it builds on my 358809:10:45
@k900:0upti.meK900Skipped that test, found another test that's also flaky09:31:43
@k900:0upti.meK900smh my head09:31:45
@k900:0upti.meK900Well good news it also fails on hydra09:40:03
@k900:0upti.meK900https://hydra.nixos.org/build/333391133/nixlog/6/tail09:40:04
@k900:0upti.meK900With a DIFFERENT TEST09:40:07
@k900:0upti.meK900The test_convergence ones are flaky, test_nyquist seems to fail consistently09:40:55
@kuflierl:matrix.orgkuflierlThis might be related to the gui pop-up. Maybe the gui pop up has gamepad input support? Steamdeck?09:45:15
@k900:0upti.meK900It's in webkitgtk09:46:40
@k900:0upti.meK900Not openconnect09:46:43
@k900:0upti.meK900And webkitgtk supports the gamepad API because it's a browser engine09:46:55
@kuflierl:matrix.orgkuflierl"gui-popup"09:48:17
@k900:0upti.meK900The point is, the webkitgtk is the same everywhere09:48:52
@k900:0upti.meK900Every application that uses webkitgtk uses the same webkitgtk09:49:00
@k900:0upti.meK900And that webkitgtk needs all the features09:49:15
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatAh sure, gamepad on web games 😁10:00:01
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat* Ah sure, gamepad for web games 😁10:00:13
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat

Rebuild progress after 2.5 days, counting successful jobs vs. all jobs:

  • ~41 % on x86_64-linux
  • ~29 % on aarch64-{darwin,linux)
    With this it seems realistic that we can make the staging* iterations much faster than the current pace of one cycle per two weeks.
10:56:19
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat *

Rebuild progress after 2.5 days, counting successful jobs vs. all jobs:

  • ~41 % on x86_64-linux
  • ~29 % on aarch64-{darwin,linux)

With this it seems realistic that we can make the staging* iterations much faster than the current pace of one cycle per two weeks.

10:56:24
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat *

Rebuild progress after 2.5 days, counting successful jobs vs. all jobs:

  • ~45 % on x86_64-linux
  • ~29 % on aarch64-{darwin,linux)

With this it seems realistic that we can make the staging* iterations much faster than the current pace of one cycle per two weeks.

10:58:04
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat2.5/0.29 = 8.611:00:35
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat(and spare x86_64-linux capacity for experimental jobsets, incl. haskell-updates, etc.)11:01:22
@csanthiago:matrix.orgcSanthiago joined the room.12:24:40
@k900:0upti.meK900OK I think I'm skipping more tests12:27:00
@k900:0upti.meK900On scipy12:27:04
@k900:0upti.meK900Because this is awwful12:27:08

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6