!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

403 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/131 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
30 Jun 2026
@k900:0upti.meK900Ughhhhh the varlink interface works09:53:22
@k900:0upti.meK900But we can't rely on it09:53:24
@k900:0upti.meK900
❯ sudo varlinkctl call /run/systemd/io.systemd.BootControl io.systemd.BootControl.Install '{"operation":"update"}'
Method call io.systemd.BootControl.Install() failed: Stale file handle
{
        "origin" : "linux",
        "errno" : 116,
        "errnoName" : "ESTALE"
}
09:54:25
@k900:0upti.meK900 ESTALE here means "nothing to do" 09:54:34
@k900:0upti.meK900I wonder if it makes sense to just do varlink09:56:23
@k900:0upti.meK900And fall back to a direct bootctl invocation09:56:30
@k900:0upti.meK900The only situation it should matter is in a chroot09:57:03
@k900:0upti.meK900 ElvishJerricco need your thonk 09:59:03
@k900:0upti.meK900Also anyone else want to bash their head against paperless10:00:16
@k900:0upti.meK900Or should I just rip a bisect10:00:20
@k900:0upti.meK900And get back to you in 3-5 business days10:00:27
@flashonfire:lithium.ovhguillaumeI can start a bisect10:21:24
@k900:0upti.meK900Ahead of you10:21:43
@k900:0upti.meK900Unfortunately,
Download Unfortunately,
10:21:59
@csanthiago:matrix.orgcSanthiago

I don't wanna bother, I see you are doing a lot of work on this merge, this is the first one I am trying to follow up... I am failing to understand how you pick the packages to fix.
I try to look on asnible, but at the end it looks like is failing just becouse one dependancy in queued, and ansible is missing it.
If it is a complex answer I can ask again after the merge is done.

10:40:36
@k900:0upti.meK900 The answer is mostly "things that break a lot of other things" 10:41:04
@k900:0upti.meK900 And also, realistically, "things we personally use" 10:41:13
@csanthiago:matrix.orgcSanthiago

(L)

10:41:30
@k900:0upti.meK900https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/ has autogenerated statistics for what packages block the most other things10:41:59
@csanthiago:matrix.orgcSanthiago

Last one, for python stuff it looks like works on eventual consistency, is it correct? at some point the dependacies will be built and the package build will not fail

10:43:09
@k900:0upti.meK900Generally, the package should not start being built10:43:23
@k900:0upti.meK900Until all of its dependencies are10:43:27
@k900:0upti.meK900If it complains about a dependency being missing, that's likely a garbage collector race condition that we're still trying to track down10:43:51
@csanthiago:matrix.orgcSanthiago

got it, thank you

10:44:23
@csanthiago:matrix.orgcSanthiago

I looked at this link several times, but went directly to x86, I blinded myself

10:45:11
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)My server config just finished building on my rock11:02:13
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all) we'll see whether it works after a reboot 11:02:26
@csanthiago:matrix.orgcSanthiago

I will be quite after this one: https://hydra.nixos.org/build/333537138#tabs-buildsteps, hydra has two build steps for python httpio, one failed and one succeed, when hydra tries to build ansible it fails because httpio reported the failed status https://hydra.nixos.org/build/333512105.
is this assumption correct?

11:05:00
@k900:0upti.meK900No, that's a queue runner bug11:08:14
@k900:0upti.meK900Anyway, you should not worry about it right now11:08:21

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6