| 22 Jun 2026 |
 Vladimír Čunát | (or whatever is slowing it down at this very moment) | 13:41:06 |
 hexa | if we only schedule 4 steps in 30s that is bad for big closures with many small files | 13:41:21 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * (or whatever is slowing it down at this very moment, e.g. on nixos-26.05) | 13:41:23 |
| hexa | Redacted or Malformed Event | 13:41:29 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * (or whatever is slowing it down at this very moment, e.g. on https://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixos/release-26.05 ) | 13:41:52 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Still, "Steps completed per minute" metric shows much higher than with the old queue-runner. | 13:42:53 |
| Vladimír Čunát | So even this phase is probably significantly faster than it used to be. | 13:43:28 |
 Alyssa Ross | have we still not disabled the non-blocker NixOS tests? | 13:44:10 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | also don't forget we recently killed half the nixos tests | 13:44:16 |
| Vladimír Čunát | We haven't. I've had too many other higher-priority tasks so far. | 13:44:44 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | I meant killing the all-drivers tests (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/532396) | 13:45:42 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Yes, I know, but I don't expect it helped dramatically with building all those etc and disk-image derivations. | 13:46:32 |
 K900 | Emily wanted to do it in the jobset unification PR | 13:46:49 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Because these drivers still do get run. | 13:46:50 |
| hexa | we don't understand the impact of container tests yet, do we? | 13:46:54 |
 emily | have local WIP with jobset merge | 14:35:03 |
| emily | so still with x86_64-darwin drop but avoiding any mass rebuilds in the process? I can split up my branch a little for that | 14:37:58 |
| emily | I'm a bit confused by the purported upper bound on the rebuilds though | 14:38:28 |
| emily | the PR has rebuild Darwin stdenv label | 14:38:32 |
| K900 | Scratch that, we don't have enough pnpm for this to need staging | 14:41:05 |
| hexa | okay, master | 14:42:00 |
| hexa | Redacted or Malformed Event | 14:42:12 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Probably, but it's mainly up to you. | 14:45:02 |
| Vladimír Čunát | That's because the CI takes an "incorrect" comparison base. | 14:45:21 |
| Vladimír Čunát | We'll be reusing 26.05 builds, not unstable/master builds | 14:45:33 |
| emily | ah, makes sense. it's almost master sized then, right? as in, it's a number of rebuilds we might have in flight from a few unfortunately large-rebuild master bumps in a row | 14:49:55 |
| emily | (I agree w/ ^ but to be fair dropping a platform will make the numbers on that hard to compare anyway) | 14:50:42 |
| K900 | I mostly care about Linux numbers tbh | 14:50:58 |
| emily | but the thing you're measuring based on, the queue resource, is shared between the platforms | 14:57:42 |
| emily | so fewer Darwin jobs is a confounder | 14:57:51 |
