| 26 Jun 2026 |
 emily | unless something something domain name | 20:59:43 |
| emily | in which case hostName + domain | 21:00:21 |
| emily | localHostName and computerName are the macOS-facing ones but not the Unix one | 21:00:40 |
| emily | former is "computery" identifier for Bonjour etc., latter is for display. ok there's your essay on macOS hostnames :) | 21:00:57 |
 K900 | that picture of nix is not cppnix is not nixpkgs is not nixos but for macOS hostnames | 21:06:24 |
 hexa | ok, eager-heisenberg is now named | 21:08:48 |
| hexa | kind-lumiere builds a llvvm | 21:09:00 |
| hexa | Redacted or Malformed Event | 21:09:02 |
| hexa | Redacted or Malformed Event | 21:09:05 |
| emily | fwiw I'm pretty sure desktop Linux has at least two of those hostname concepts :P | 21:38:16 |
| hexa |
/nix/store/5vmd3cqj6skjajg0yj9jl8dsddwp0700-bash-5.3p9/bin/bash: line 1: /nix/store/v6zk257yx9736bpwf5jyl1v0y5pvydia-perl-5.42.0/bin/perl: No such file or directory
| 21:39:27 |
| hexa | sigh | 21:39:31 |
| hexa | this is getting annoying fast | 21:39:46 |
| hexa | draining for gc sounds really plausible right now | 21:41:05 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | What i do wonder... The openmp thread hogging issues, why did they pop up now? Did they pop up because new hydra queue runner can actually keep up with supplying build machines fast enough? or is there some other reason? | 22:57:26 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | * What i do wonder... The openmp thread hogging issues, why did they pop up now? Did they pop up because new hydra queue runner can actually keep up with supplying jobs to build machines fast enough? or is there some other reason? | 22:57:43 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | I'd have expected this to be much more of a problem already | 22:58:22 |
| hexa | yeah, higher occupation | 22:58:27 |
| hexa | https://grafana.nixos.org/d/mel9fqb/very-simple-combined-occupancy?orgId=1&from=now-30d&to=now&timezone=browser | 22:58:52 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | okay yeah adjusting the average to get less noise, we are seeing about the maximum occupation we had before only occasionally. Time will tell whether this will stay like that, but is already a quite interesting observation about new queue runner | 23:02:56 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | 
Download image.png | 23:02:56 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | makes sense, ty :) | 23:03:41 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | * okay yeah adjusting the average to get less noise, we are seeing about the maximum occupation we had only occasionally before. Time will tell whether this will stay like that, but is already a quite interesting observation about new queue runner | 23:04:26 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | Actually I have an idea to get both data from the noisy and the long average with some nice extra info... Will build a graph for that tomorrow and see what I can observe with it | 23:17:16 |
| hexa | new staging-next https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/535855 | 23:17:18 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | Damn, when was the last time vcunat didn't do the staging-next? | 23:19:04 |
| hexa | oh no, the eval check for x86_64-darwin is failing | 23:19:08 |
| hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+head%3Astaging-next+-author%3Avcunat+is%3Aclosed+in%3Atitle+staging-next+sort%3Acreated-desc+label%3A10.rebuild-linux-stdenv | 23:20:33 |
| hexa | it's been a while | 23:20:36 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | Damn! One k900, and then 2023 before that. 3 years non-stop staging is a lot. | 23:21:44 |
