!UUYziobKGGxpovWyAN:nixos.org

Robotnix

258 Members
Build Android (AOSP) using Nix | https://github.com/danielfullmer/robotnix84 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
24 Oct 2021
@kranzes:matrix.orgkranzesbut that's for me to figure out tomorrow 21:15:58
@kranzes:matrix.orgkranzesGood night!21:16:00
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrf before and after you could run: nix eval -f --arg configuration '{flavor="<flavor>";}' --raw config.buildNumber to use in the commit/tag 21:17:08
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrfSee also: https://github.com/danielfullmer/robotnix/blob/master/scripts/release-tag.sh21:17:20
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrfthanks, good night!21:17:23
@kranzes:matrix.orgkranzesCould either use the add-and-commit workflow or just run it all through git commands21:27:13
@kranzes:matrix.orgkranzesLatter is faster 21:27:22
@kranzes:matrix.orgkranzesSame end result 21:27:28
@kranzes:matrix.orgkranzesFirst option looks nicer usually 21:27:39
@kranzes:matrix.orgkranzesBut with those scripts it's kinda simple 21:27:58
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrfBtw, rbootnix tags are signed with a GPG key whose key material is on my personal yubikey. So unless there is a way to add signature to an existing tag, that'll still have to take place locally on my machine21:30:39
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrf * Btw, robotnix tags are signed with a GPG key whose key material is on my personal yubikey. So unless there is a way to add signature to an existing tag, that'll still have to take place locally on my machine21:30:44
@kranzes:matrix.orgkranzesHmm21:31:44
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrfbut even just having a PR with the output from an auto-update script would be valuable21:32:08
@kranzes:matrix.orgkranzesThat won't be hard to do, yeah 21:33:45
@kranzes:matrix.orgkranzesStill need to manually, merge, tag, sign21:34:10
@kranzes:matrix.orgkranzesBetter than nothing though 21:34:25
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrfI also test a build before tagging on each of those flavors21:34:50
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrfThe eventual hope would be that we can just do the testing of minor updates automatically through cuttlefish too21:35:29
@kranzes:matrix.orgkranzes
In reply to @danielrf:matrix.org
I also test a build before tagging on each of those flavors
So it won't be completely automated either way
21:36:30
@kranzes:matrix.orgkranzesUnless we do the cuttlefish thing21:36:56
@yuka:yuka.devYuka (she/her)
In reply to @yuka:yuka.dev
GrapheneOS on bramble
Everything seems to work fine
23:04:56
@yuka:yuka.devYuka (she/her)Should microG work? I tested Graphene's sandboxed play services feature once more, but apparently there are still some missing shims for the play services location APIs.23:38:16
@yuka:yuka.devYuka (she/her)Also the GrapheneOS matrix channel is a mess23:41:20
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrfNot sure, I'm currently working on testing microg in vanilla and grapheneos now.23:42:27
@yuka:yuka.devYuka (she/her)
In reply to @yuka:yuka.dev
Also the GrapheneOS matrix channel is a mess
Just mentioning microG in there will prompt a bunch of people to explain that microG is insecure and shouldn't be used.... lol
23:42:55
@yuka:yuka.devYuka (she/her)
hash mismatch in fixed-output derivation '/nix/store/qln9f0h1sicl6aldrsnn10qxz4w1y6kg-microg-12.patch':
  wanted: sha256:0002i64dz4i0i5xv2cz51k08phlkhhg620b06n25bp2x88226m06
  got:    sha256:1i7vbqk9m3s0l0ilc4db8898kd162f0s1xssnd5vjh87smzq5b26
23:44:57
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrfI did a force push to that branch to fix that23:45:50
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrfSry23:45:52
@yuka:yuka.devYuka (she/her)whoops23:45:55

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6