!VRULIdgoKmKPzJZzjj:nixos.org

Nix Package Manager development

865 Members
For people hacking on Nix: https://github.com/NixOS/nix Nix maintainers can be reached here.183 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
26 Nov 2025
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen dramforever: right I finally looked up this matrix today.... hehe 14:20:37
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92 dramforever: should we also invite the debian nix maintainer here? 14:21:43
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen dramforever: -Dlibstore:sandbox-shell=%{_bindir}/busybox 14:22:06
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever ah so like, /bin/busybox? 14:22:39
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92https://packages.debian.org/sid/nix-bin 14:22:44
@juhp:matrix.orgJens PetersenWell the package git is https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nix14:23:02
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen dramforever: right 14:23:19
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersenspecifically https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nix/blob/rawhide/f/nix.spec and neighbouring files14:24:29
@juhp:matrix.orgJens PetersenI certainly welcome feedback and suggestions on the packaging. You can also see https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f44-change-proposal-nix-package-tool-selfcontained/17039114:25:51
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersenwhich was just formally approved yesterday.... hence....14:27:07
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen* which was just formally approved yesterday.... hence.... (it is really a Feature not a Change, but we don't have "features" anymore...)14:27:48
@juhp:matrix.orgJens PetersenAnyway really appreciate your detailed comments and engagement now in this conversation - very helpful14:28:42
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen* Anyway really appreciate your detailed comments and engagement here now in this channel conversation - very helpful14:29:01
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverokay the busybox looks fine to me14:29:58
@juhp:matrix.orgJens PetersenGoodie, phew :)14:30:12
@juhp:matrix.orgJens PetersenSome nix user suggested that to me.... involved in some fedora derivative...14:30:51
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverjust making sure this doesn't happen https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/nix-busybox/-/issues/214:30:56
@juhp:matrix.orgJens PetersenOkay14:31:41
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen* Okay 👍️14:32:05
@juhp:matrix.orgJens Petersen* Okay 👍️ - it was actually quite hard to track down the problem/solution14:32:54
@matt:1e0.uk@matt:1e0.uk removed their profile picture.16:52:24
@matt:1e0.uk@matt:1e0.uk removed their display name Matt.16:53:20
@matt:1e0.uk@matt:1e0.uk left the room.16:53:26
@shine:proqqul.netTaeer Bar-YamIf someone has time at some point to review a PR of mine from 2022 😅 It's obviously not urgent, but I think it's still valid and relevant, and I rebased and squashed a few of the commits together. https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/647219:06:45
@shine:proqqul.netTaeer Bar-YamThe PR description is kind of out-of-date though. The commit messages are better for that.19:10:37
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth) oof, nix-shell. Have I bothered you with https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330822 yet? 19:54:15
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth)it's WIP but whatever ^^'19:54:33
@whispers:catgirl.cloud@whispers:catgirl.cloud joined the room.21:47:15
@whispers:catgirl.cloud@whispers:catgirl.cloud left the room.21:50:07
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth)I mean https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/7501. Basically nix-shell is hard to change, and nixpkgs would be a better home for its successor that doesn't suffer from having to be the only entrypoint23:47:48

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6