| 23 Sep 2021 |
 Jan Tojnar | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/139144 | 11:29:40 |
| 24 Sep 2021 |
 maxine (they/them) | No, I only bumped everything, reverted a few things the update script gets wrong, and was going to start on getting my personal laptop to 41. Hopefully this weekend, but I'll at least try to rebase and push all my commits to that branch | 09:26:26 |
| 25 Sep 2021 |
| maxine (they/them) | Going a bit slow, because I'm also spending a bunch of cycles building other things, but I'm making progress on 41 building | 16:13:50 |
| maxine (they/them) | tbh biggest blocker for me right now is "only" having some ~36 threads for nix 😅 | 16:15:35 |
| maxine (they/them) | Jan Tojnar: does the update script have support for gating updates by upper version (sorry for not reading it myself to find out)? e.g. atkmm/glibmm/libsoup/libgda and so forth are a bit annoying when bumped by it | 16:45:52 |
| 26 Sep 2021 |
| Jan Tojnar | maxine (they/them): not at the moment unfortunately | 22:58:45 |
| Jan Tojnar | maxine (they/them): actually, the script for finding versions supports it | 23:05:54 |
| Jan Tojnar | but the update script support is wonky | 23:06:07 |
| Jan Tojnar | you can pass freeze = true and it will only look for versions < ${major}.${minor+1} | 23:09:24 |
| Jan Tojnar | * but the update script support is limited | 23:09:39 |
| Jan Tojnar | but I guess that is fine for libraries | 23:09:51 |
| 27 Sep 2021 |
| maxine (they/them) | Ta, I'll try to go back and fix that up for libraries that need it, before we're done with 41 | 14:12:03 |
| 30 Sep 2021 |
|  matrixforever joined the room. | 02:16:17 |
| matrixforever left the room. | 04:37:16 |
| 3 Oct 2021 |
| maxine (they/them) | 
Download Screenshot from 2021-10-03 02-51-45.png | 00:52:36 |
| maxine (they/them) | My subset of GNOME seems to be fine (I rebased the branch on ToT as of ~6 hours ago) | 00:52:38 |
| maxine (they/them) | Guess I'll comment out all my exclusions tho and see how that goes, but for the parts I care about, nothing seems broken or changed in any way | 00:53:11 |
| maxine (they/them) | * Guess I'll comment out all my exclusions tho and see how that goes, but for the parts I care about, nothing seems broken or wrong in any way, so far. | 00:53:27 |
| maxine (they/them) | Journal seems clean too, other than the usual yelling about USB devices (thanks dell? apple? I don't know who to blame) | 00:55:27 |
| maxine (they/them) | Jan Tojnar: How do you feel about cherrypicking in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/136893, or at least the package bumps? Though I personally have a strong preference with matching upstream naming conventions, I'm not gonna push for that to be a thing. | 00:57:48 |
| maxine (they/them) | Looking at the board you created, I am thankfully avoiding any issues with the ssh agent changes, as I was already avoiding gnome keyring in favour of gpg-agent... so I guess I'll actually try using this as my daily driver for a bit | 01:01:10 |
| Jan Tojnar | maxine (they/them): yeah, when I tried in the VM it was suspiciously calm | 04:18:49 |
| Jan Tojnar | and the changelogs were also quite mild this cycle | 04:19:05 |
| Jan Tojnar | the only major pain points are the ssh agent changes and libsoup3 shenanigans | 04:19:37 |
| Jan Tojnar | maxine (they/them): I am in favour, we can merge it directly to master | 04:23:58 |
| Jan Tojnar | only thing I am not sure about is the alias – ideally we would either have glibmm point to the latest version and then pinned would not be needed | 04:25:33 |
| Jan Tojnar | or we would have just the pinned | 04:25:51 |
| Jan Tojnar | (either way we will break stuff outside nixpkgs) | 04:26:13 |
| maxine (they/them) | Could just have the alias pointing to old as a holdover for 21.11, and we drop it after the release is done? That way there's no immediate breakage, and by 22.05 it's been 6 months of that change being present, so no one can say it came out of nowhere :) | 09:42:13 |
| Jan Tojnar | sounds good too | 14:18:27 |
