In reply to @jonringer:matrix.org
As long as I feel like we all of have Nix as the first priority. I can tolerate some behavior that I may not agree with. But having other people tell me how I should act, say, or think is not making Nix a priority. It's making their narrative a priority.

"a healthy community is necessary for the success of Nix"

I believe we have different opinions about what health means. I mean RFC#114, I think you mean RFC#98.

this seems to imply that you believe that you personally could not ever do anything to make the Nix community less healthy

I want to see it succeed. But it is within my fallibility to cause damage unintentionally. Also, please avoid ad-hominem comments, it largely serves to make the other defensive.

because if you could, then other people should be able to say something about how you act or what you say

If I'm out of line, then I would like to know. I'm human. I'm imperfect. I have biases, both conscious and unconscious.

and calling out hypothetical problematic behaviour would be making Nix a priority.

No. I've been advocating for months that someone (or people) with problem resolution skills should be able to effectively arbitrate situations which could escalate.

to try and word it more bluntly, to hopefully make more obvious where I'm seeing a logical contradiction (without intending to personally attack you):

1. you accept that you could hypothetically act 'poorly' (for some definition of that term)
2. you seem to agree that a healthy community is necessary for the success of Nix
3. you seem to agree that resolving 'poor' behaviour is necessary for the community to remain healthy
4. resolving such a situation will sometimes (or even often) require calling out the behaviour, because otherwise there is nothing to 'resolve'
5. but you would not accept someone criticizing you on your behaviour or comments (ie. calling it out)

so in the hypothetical situation that you are behaving 'poorly', if one is not allowed to call it out so that it can be resolved (through mediation or otherwise), then that logically means that the behaviour cannot be corrected, and therefore the 'healthy community' objective cannot be achieved. no?

In reply to @domenkozar:matrix.org
joepie91 🏳️‍🌈: I'm quite worried about the culture of telling people not to express their negative feelings on the RFC

In reply to @joepie91:pixie.town
jonringer: to clarify, my message wasn't a personal attack, nor an attempt to imply that you are behaving problematically. I'm just trying to better understand where you're drawing the lines of what is and isn't acceptable in the context of Nix's health as a project, because I cannot logically resolve the statements you've made so far into a clear conclusion

In reply to @joepie91:pixie.town
piegames: I believe that is due to be clarified in the RFC