!aRKdLCkUeIFjRPZuJT:nixos.org

NixOS JVM

122 Members
27 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
4 Nov 2024
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily8, 11, 17, 21 are LTS; 25 will be too IIRC (current schedule is 2 versions/year, LTS every 2 years, so every 4 versions)01:09:33
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilynon-LTS releases are only supported up to the release of the next release, so e.g. 23 will be replaced with 2401:09:45
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily I think we should actually consider not having stuff like openjdk23 but instead just a rolling openjdk_latest. IIRC Fedora does it like that. 01:10:09
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilysince pinning a specific non-LTS version it futile, it will be EOL as soon as there is another one01:10:23
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily * since pinning a specific non-LTS version is futile, it will be EOL as soon as there is another one01:10:28
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily so e.g. jdk_8, jdk_11, jdk_17, jdk_21, jdk_latest 01:10:40
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily(what's the issue?)01:21:15
@tomodachi94:matrix.orgTomodachi94 (they/them)
In reply to@emilazy:matrix.org
(what's the issue?)
Someone was discontent with the versioning of jdk16. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/138219
01:22:40
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyyou know shit is serious when the Java bug reporter has a Duke avatar01:23:05
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilymy update script will ensure no further reoccurrence of this type of malarkey, thankfully01:23:30
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilysince it updates to only GA versions (but picks the tag that has the build number info, for when I un-mess-up the version handling in our package)01:24:07
@tomodachi94:matrix.orgTomodachi94 (they/them) Thoughts on adding another JDK @emily? /lh https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/218777 02:04:52
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyover my dead body02:06:48
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyit's incredible how much Java people care about different binaries of the same source code02:07:23
@tomodachi94:matrix.orgTomodachi94 (they/them)It's even got (GPLv2) upstreamable performance and security fixes too!02:15:28
@tomodachi94:matrix.orgTomodachi94 (they/them)* It's even got (GPLv2) "additional enhancements to boost performance, security and compatibility with different platforms" too!02:15:55
@tomodachi94:matrix.orgTomodachi94 (they/them)A diff of their source tarballs and the corresponding OpenJDK sources would be interesting02:17:08
@tomodachi94:matrix.orgTomodachi94 (they/them)* It's even got (GPLv2) "additional enhancements to boost performance, security and compatibility with different platforms" too! /lh02:18:09
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyindeed02:18:25
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI am sure some of the distributions do have valuable additions, but I suspect a lot of the mystique around different OpenJDK binary distributions is just that02:18:45
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily Zulu backported aarch64-darwin support to JDK 8, which is nice. 02:19:09
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily (I wish Element didn't just show mxc://matrix… for custom reactions. I always have to guess at what emotion is being expressed.) 02:19:27
@tomodachi94:matrix.orgTomodachi94 (they/them)(mostly upvote emojis in this channel)02:20:15
@tomodachi94:matrix.orgTomodachi94 (they/them)* (mostly upvote emojis in this channel, from me at least)02:20:32
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyhere I thought it would be :unqualified_disgust: and :face_of_absolute_abhorrence:!02:23:30
@tomodachi94:matrix.orgTomodachi94 (they/them)Off to triage more Java issues in Nixpkgs and/or make those emojis and use them in this channel specifically03:02:21
@tomodachi94:matrix.orgTomodachi94 (they/them) 03:29:09
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilylmao03:35:07
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywonderufl03:35:20
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily * wonderful03:35:23

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6