| 7 Jun 2024 |
| @alex3829:matrix.org removed their display name real_z2. | 23:43:48 |
| 8 Jun 2024 |
ris_ | think it's ok for me to backport https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/317575 to 24.05? it doesn't actually document anything new, all of these flags are already in 24.05 | 11:59:12 |
fricklerhandwerk | In reply to @r_i_s:matrix.org think it's ok for me to backport https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/317575 to 24.05? it doesn't actually document anything new, all of these flags are already in 24.05 Sure | 12:48:24 |
| 10 Jun 2024 |
| NixOS Moderation Bot unbanned jonringer. | 00:17:07 |
| clvxaz joined the room. | 17:31:57 |
| 11 Jun 2024 |
| camzer joined the room. | 23:51:53 |
| 12 Jun 2024 |
| Lorenz Leutgeb removed their display name Lorenz Leutgeb. | 00:31:17 |
| Lorenz Leutgeb set their display name to Lorenz Leutgeb. | 00:32:51 |
| 15 Jun 2024 |
getpsyched | I was wondering what's the status of PR review material in nixpkgs. So far, I've seen some points put in nixos/README.md and pkgs/README.md for reviewing contributions. Are there any other "official" or community efforts on this? | 12:04:37 |
fricklerhandwerk | In reply to @getpsyched:matrix.org I was wondering what's the status of PR review material in nixpkgs. So far, I've seen some points put in nixos/README.md and pkgs/README.md for reviewing contributions. Are there any other "official" or community efforts on this? These are the only places, to my knowledge. | 14:29:07 |
getpsyched | Hmm. It might be worthwhile making a single resource where all of these things are combined as a comprehensive guide. I'm willing to take this on sometime soon. Wondering what would be a good place to put it; Maybe a dedicated project or, better yet, a wiki page 🤔 | 14:31:59 |
getpsyched | * Hmm. It might be worthwhile making a single resource where all of these things are combined as a comprehensive guide. I'm willing to take this on sometime soon. Wondering what would be a good place to put it; Maybe a dedicated project or, better yet, a wiki page 🤔 | 14:32:06 |
proofconstruction | Depends on what you mean by PR review materials, really. Guidelines for what to look for when reviewing? In any case, information scoped to a particular project should live in that project’s repo. | 20:47:06 |