| 1 Aug 2021 |
 John Ericson | sterni (he/him): ah, yes him | 17:15:50 |
 sterni (he/him) | ah, I see | 17:16:33 |
| John Ericson | sterni (he/him): https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/132340 | 17:25:17 |
|  alexfmpe joined the room. | 17:33:07 |
| John Ericson | sterni (he/him): alexfmpe how best to make a PR we can all push to? | 17:34:56 |
| sterni (he/him) | John Ericson: I think you and me should be able to push to any branch in alex's fork for which a PR exists if the allow maintainers to push box is ticked upon creation | 17:35:59 |
| John Ericson | ok | 17:36:24 |
| alexfmpe | I don't recall ticking but I see Allow edits and access to secrets by maintainers seems checked on the open PRs, so it should just work? | 17:36:57 |
| sterni (he/him) | yeah, it's the default | 17:37:19 |
| John Ericson | alexfmpe: can you make a blank PR or something then? | 17:37:38 |
| John Ericson | I can push a few basic things to it | 17:37:50 |
| alexfmpe | In reply to @Ericson2314:matrix.org
alexfmpe: can you make a blank PR or something then? if you mean because of the allow maintainers thing, it shouldn't be needed? | 17:38:31 |
| alexfmpe | or just collapse everything there instead? | 17:38:41 |
| John Ericson | i mean make a branch and make it a PR so i can push to it | 17:39:02 |
| John Ericson | if it's not a PR there is no chance for check box to do things | 17:39:13 |
 siraben | John Ericson: is there a way to make pdp11-aout a valid double? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/131332 | 17:40:25 |
| alexfmpe | huuh I'd expect you to be able to push to those PRs. if you want a new one, I'm not understanding what I should put on it | 17:40:27 |
| alexfmpe | like, it needs actual commits to PR no? | 17:40:39 |
| siraben | https://github.com/JamesHagerman/gcc-pdp11-aout | 17:41:01 |
| John Ericson | alexfmpe: i forget if one can open a 0 commit PR | 17:41:04 |
| alexfmpe | I'll check | 17:41:11 |
| siraben | * PDP-11 support for GCC https://github.com/JamesHagerman/gcc-pdp11-aout | 17:41:15 |
| alexfmpe | but what would its title be anyway | 17:41:16 |
| John Ericson | siraben: you want an aout next to elf in parse.nix | 17:41:18 |
| John Ericson | and then you might need one of those special cases to parse it | 17:41:29 |
| alexfmpe | is this about the libssl splintering thing? | 17:41:32 |
| alexfmpe | er, ssp | 17:41:36 |
| John Ericson | alexfmpe: yeah | 17:41:40 |
| John Ericson | the issue I linked above | 17:41:45 |
| siraben | In reply to @Ericson2314:matrix.org
siraben: you want an aout next to elf in parse.nix yep, added that in the PR | 17:42:02 |
