| 20 Dec 2023 |
 Robert Hensing (roberth) | Just read that one | 16:34:58 |
 infinisil | Robert Hensing (roberth): Ah yes, thanks, just addressed that | 16:39:08 |
| 21 Dec 2023 |
| infinisil | Unless there's opposition, I'll merge https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/274591 later today | 19:01:05 |
| 23 Dec 2023 |
|  raitobezarius changed their display name from raitobezarius to raitobezarius (DECT 2128). | 22:22:09 |
| 25 Dec 2023 |
|  lassulus changed their display name from lassulus to lassulus (8587). | 22:41:42 |
| 28 Dec 2023 |
|  @piegames:matrix.org changed their display name from piegames to piegames ☎ 9712. | 01:33:05 |
| @piegames:matrix.org changed their display name from piegames ☎ 9712 to piegames [☎ 9712]. | 01:33:13 |
| 30 Dec 2023 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | An instance of package metadata that really shouldn't be on a package attrset (passthru etc). https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/277221/files#r1438566568 | 11:35:03 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | We should have a place for this kind of thing that isn't a random file somewhere | 11:36:06 |
| lassulus changed their display name from lassulus (8587) to lassulus. | 19:30:23 |
| raitobezarius changed their display name from raitobezarius (DECT 2128) to raitobezarius. | 19:52:43 |
| 31 Dec 2023 |
| @piegames:matrix.org changed their display name from piegames [☎ 9712] to piegames. | 12:40:25 |
|  Philip Taron (UTC-8) changed their display name from Philip Taron to Philip Taron (UTC-8). | 18:10:46 |
|  kaction joined the room. | 23:36:39 |
| 5 Jan 2024 |
| infinisil | In order to enforce pkgs/by-name for new packages, I split off a bunch of internal code changes into a separate PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/278805 | 00:55:36 |
| infinisil | This PR is ready to be reviewed! | 00:55:59 |
| infinisil | It doesn't change any functionality though, and the tests still pass, so I'm fairly confident and will likely self-merge rather soon in order to unblock the main PR that actually does the enforcing of pkgs/by-name | 00:58:11 |
 @profpatsch:augsburg.one | infinisil: so is the system in place now? i.e. any new package should use the new style? | 01:20:01 |
| @profpatsch:augsburg.one | Ah I see a bunch of packages have already been migrated | 01:21:17 |
| infinisil | Profpatsch: It's been usable every since Nixcon, and a lot of people are already using it. After the above PR (and one more), it's going to be enforced for new packages | 01:22:19 |
| infinisil | * Profpatsch: It's been usable ever since Nixcon, and a lot of people are already using it. After the above PR (and one more), it's going to be enforced for new packages | 01:22:27 |
| @profpatsch:augsburg.one | infinisil: can’t there be a pkgs/by-name/fo/foo/overrides.nix? | 01:22:43 |
| @profpatsch:augsburg.one | Instead of putting overrides in all-packages.nix | 01:22:50 |
| @profpatsch:augsburg.one | feels like a weird step back if all-packages.nix is still needed for that | 01:23:06 |
| infinisil | It's not a step back, all-packages.nix has been required so far, now it's only required less | 01:23:35 |
| infinisil | In reply to @profpatsch:augsburg.one
infinisil: can’t there be a pkgs/by-name/fo/foo/overrides.nix? Profpatsch: It's a future change that we could do, but for now nothing has been decided, it's not in RFC 140 | 01:24:17 |
| @profpatsch:augsburg.one | ok | 01:24:34 |
| infinisil | Profpatsch: https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/blob/master/rfcs/0140-simple-package-paths.md#allow-callpackage-arguments-to-be-specified-in-argsnix | 01:25:03 |
| @profpatsch:augsburg.one | what should I do for the skawarePackages namespace? | 01:25:11 |
| @profpatsch:augsburg.one | I only alias packages on the toplevel from that namespace | 01:25:27 |
