| 29 May 2023 |
 Robert Hensing (roberth) | Maybe I should have bunched these up in a file, but I'm almost done now | 14:01:04 |
 infinisil | Maybe a larger change, I think it was hinted at at some point: Maybe this shouldn't be called a standard when it's Nixpkgs-internal, because people might still be inclined to use it when it's called a standard | 14:01:09 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | But then there's a need for a custom argument, which then -> But when the need for a custom argument arises, it then | 14:01:40 |
| infinisil | We only want to standardize it for others to use in the future, then it should be called a standard | 14:01:42 |
| infinisil | * We only want to standardize it for others to use at some point in the future, then it should be called a standard | 14:02:05 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | This bullet looks weird: Make the requirement also apply the other way around: Files outside the unit directory cannot access files inside it | 14:02:45 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) |
Potentially establish an updateScript standard to avoid problems like, relates to Flakes too
??
| 14:04:30 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | I think libsForQt5.callPackage is already soft deprecated? But it's probably still an ok example | 14:05:11 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) |
Alright, that's about it. With those i's dotted, it looks good. Nothing significant, so I'll approve now | 14:06:35 |
 raitobezarius | (apologies I'm on the move, I will reply later to the messages) | 14:15:08 |
| infinisil | Robert Hensing (roberth): Nice thanks :D | 14:16:05 |
| infinisil | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
Maybe a larger change, I think it was hinted at at some point: Maybe this shouldn't be called a standard when it's Nixpkgs-internal, because people might still be inclined to use it when it's called a standard While we could do this (along with other things discussed today), I don't think it's necessary, so I'm all good for FCP too | 14:19:02 |
| infinisil | piegames: I think you were intending to write a discourse post to announce FCP right? | 14:19:54 |
 @piegames:matrix.org | The GitHub announcement first, but working on it yes | 14:22:08 |
| infinisil | Sounds good to me, thanks :D | 14:22:50 |
| infinisil | Let's get this to the finish line 🚀 | 14:23:07 |
| @piegames:matrix.org | done | 14:45:39 |
| @piegames:matrix.org | infinisil Maybe please do another pass through the backlog and mark some of the conversation threads as resolved | 14:46:14 |
| @piegames:matrix.org | Who is responsible for creating the Discourse announcement? After scrolling through https://discourse.nixos.org/c/announcements/rfc-announcements/22, I'm a bit uncertain | 14:53:16 |
| @piegames:matrix.org | The RFC process does not specify this, unfortunately | 14:53:42 |
| infinisil | piegames: I'd say it doesn't matter | 15:41:24 |
| infinisil | piegames: Imo go for it! | 15:44:39 |
| @piegames:matrix.org | hah | 15:45:20 |
| @piegames:matrix.org | the question has been resolved by the fact that I apparently don't even have rights to post in that category … | 15:45:35 |
| infinisil | Huh, I didn't even know that was a thing | 15:45:55 |
| infinisil | piegames: I should be able to, can you send me the content? | 15:46:30 |
| @piegames:matrix.org | Haven't written it yet. But see the other posts in that category, they either use a copy-paste template or just straight up only contain the link to the PR | 15:47:29 |
| infinisil | Hmm: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/rfc-0052-fcp-away-from-static-ids/4291 | 15:47:49 |
| infinisil | Oh, it should be the RFC announcements category right? https://discourse.nixos.org/t/bootspec-rfc-now-in-fcp/26598 | 15:48:07 |
| infinisil | Yeah I can't post there either 😅 | 15:48:50 |
