| 11 Mar 2026 |
 Gaétan Lepage | connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) would you agree with a 12.8 -> 12.9 global bump before messing around with 13.0? | 11:05:21 |
|  Theuni changed their display name from Theuni to Christian Theune. | 14:13:00 |
 connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) | Sure! I remember some weird breakages a while back when I had wanted to bump immediately after 12.9 became available, but hopefully they’re all resolved by now :) | 16:08:54 |
| Gaétan Lepage | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/498861 | 16:43:46 |
| Gaétan Lepage | connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8)
About https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/498681, I plan to build torch and vllm. If this works fine, I will merge it.
With the CUDA PRs on the way, I won't have the capacity to exhaustively test all of them.
No objection on your side? | 23:37:24 |
| Gaétan Lepage | (same reasonning for https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/498678#issuecomment-4035473707). | 23:39:46 |
| Gaétan Lepage | * (same reasonning for https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/498678). | 23:39:52 |
| connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) | Sounds good! I’ll leave a comment on them | 23:51:04 |
| Gaétan Lepage | I'm testing the CUDA bump more thoroughly though.
~1.3k rebuilds left (out of 1.8k) | 23:53:19 |
| Gaétan Lepage | * connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8)
About https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/498681, I plan to build torch and vllm. If this works fine, I will merge it.
With all the CUDA PRs in the queue, I won't have the capacity to exhaustively test all of them.
No objection on your side? | 23:54:04 |
| 12 Mar 2026 |
| Theuni changed their display name from Christian Theune to Theuni. | 07:18:55 |
 Bryan Honof | It looks like torch's supportedTorchCudaCapabilities was out-of-sync with upstream. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/499216
How would I use nixpkgs-review to test these changes?
| 10:53:19 |
| 4 Aug 2022 |
|  Winter (she/her) joined the room. | 03:26:42 |
| Winter (she/her) | (hi, just came here to read + respond to this.) | 03:28:52 |
 tpw_rules | hey. i had previously sympathzied with samuela and like i said before had some of the same frustrations. i just edited my github comment to add "[CUDA] packages are universally complicated, fragile to package, and critical to daily operations. Nix being able to manage them is unbelievably helpful to those of us who work with them regularly, even if support is downgraded to only having an expectation of function on stable branches." | 03:29:14 |
| Winter (she/her) | In reply to @tpw_rules:matrix.org
i'm mildly peeved about a recent merging of something i maintain where i'm pretty sure the merger does not own the expensive hardware required to properly test the package. i don't think it broke anything but i was given precisely 45 minutes to see the notification before somebody merged it ugh, 45 minutes? that's... not great. not to air dirty laundry but did you do what samuela did in the wandb PR and at least say that that wasn't a great thing to do? (not sure how else to word that, you get what i mean) | 03:30:23 |
| tpw_rules | no, i haven't yet, but i probably will | 03:31:03 |
| Winter (she/her) | i admittedly did that with a PR once, i forget how long the maintainer was requested for but i merged it because multiple people reported it fixed the issue. the maintainer said "hey, don't do that" after and now i do think twice before merging. so it could help, is what i'm saying. | 03:31:50 |
| tpw_rules | i'm not sure what went wrong with the wandb PR anyway, i think it was just a boneheaded move on the maintainer's part | 03:32:10 |
| Winter (she/her) | (it was also simple enough that it was fine and the maintainer said it looked good after) | 03:32:15 |
| tpw_rules | * i'm not sure what went wrong with the wandb PR anyway, i think it was just a boneheaded move on the merger's part | 03:32:19 |
| tpw_rules | but i thought most of the frustration was around packages which don't really involve CUDA breaking the fragile CUDA packages, and i'm not sure how the warning helps in this case. it's not like nixpkgs-review prints out the comments. maybe i'm wrong. but it is a legitimate problem | 03:34:19 |
| Winter (she/her) | the frustration that i see is that people are touching packages that he maintains, am i missing further context here? | 03:35:09 |
| tpw_rules | did you ever see this? https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixpkgss-current-development-workflow-is-not-sustainable/18741 | 03:35:43 |
| Winter (she/her) | oh yes i did | 03:35:49 |
| Winter (she/her) | but that's not what the topic of this PR/the notice is, though? | 03:36:11 |
| Winter (she/her) | this wouldn't help that | 03:36:14 |
| Winter (she/her) | ~~is that what you're saying and i'm just lagging behind~~ | 03:36:27 |
| tpw_rules | no it wouldn't, but it reads to me like that's the underlying problem and this is a manifestation which can be controlled more easily. not to put thoughts in people's head | 03:37:07 |
| Winter (she/her) | right
(what do you mean by that last sentence, you don't want to influence anyone's opinion on the matter by saying that?) | 03:38:29 |
