NixOS GSoC | 247 Members | |
| 24 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Mar 2026 | ||
| I'll talk to my amrit about whether he can see any way to split the proposal. Maybe the opcodes can be divided. | 13:53:23 | |
| Hi, probably a late introduction. I'm Vivek Tiwari and I'm interested in contributing to the modular services project. I've been reading through the documentation and the related PRs/issues to understand how it works. I was wondering what would be a good next step. Should I try porting an existing service (if I'm allowed to)? | 15:24:19 | |
| I don't think we have capacity to track that, and everyone deserves a fair chance. The GSoC process is that participants send their applications to GSoC and then a selection will be made by the mentors. This isn't particularly fun or efficient, but there really isn't much we can do to change that. | 15:54:30 | |
| Not really how it works. Everyone gets a fair chance in the selection process | 15:56:37 | |
| If mentor availability for discussion is not spread evenly that's unfortunate and arguably unfair, but that is a hard problem to compensate for, especially because we have imperfect information too. I want to agree with the GSoC docs that talking early is beneficial | 15:59:46 | |
| written text is a particularly fast medium, but you are free to differentiate your proposal to your advantage :) | 16:01:30 | |
| 18 Mar 2026 | ||
| 02:14:47 | ||
| I was able to find a mentor for this idea. Thank you for calling | 04:09:16 | |
| Hi. I wanted to contribute to the nix-security-tracker. Whom should I contact as mentor? | 10:57:53 | |
| 11:18:10 | ||
Download image.png | 11:29:53 | |
| You might want to contact fricklerhandwerk. | 11:33:40 | |
| 11:36:10 | ||
| Hello everyone. I am Emmanuel. Although I'm currently in a coding bootcamp learning Cloud Computing and DevOps, I'm new to open source. I've heard a lot of good things about NixOS, and I'm slowly making the switch over. I pored through the 2026 ideas, and I've decided to submit my proposal for Review Nixpkgs PRs as it fits my desire to learn the project's operation, and at the same time, I can improve my knowledge in Nix and get started contributing to open source. However, I may need some pointers regarding what the proposal structure should look like for Review Nixpkgs PRs. | 11:49:09 | |
| 11:49:55 | ||
| 20:32:09 | ||
| 21:58:20 | ||
| 19 Mar 2026 | ||
| 03:56:19 | ||
| Hello! I'm Ethan Reece. I'm currently an MS CS student at UT Dallas, and I love to hack around with Nix configurations. I have a project that extends Devenv with automatic editor/AI integrations for LSP/formatters. I also have a set of extendable Nix configurations for myself that focuses on compartmentalization, and I recently started adding security hardening to the NixOS-specific portions, focusing on I came across GSoC recently and am also looking for more ways to get involved in open source projects that other people use (and am looking for Nix-related jobs as well). Seeing the ideas list, Review Nixpkgs PRs looks like something I could get involved in, and I'm also interested in ideas related to my development environment work in the project I mentioned above. I also find security interesting as well as security-focused OSes like Genode, which someone worked on a Nix integration for and I think is a cool idea. Considering that I'm new to GSoC (and contributing in general), does anyone have any guidence or recommendations for next steps? | 04:51:29 | |
| Hi, I’m interested in the “Improved release notes for Nixpkgs” GSoC project. Could someone tell me who the mentor is? | 06:31:26 | |
| Hey all, I'm Jack. I'm a computing science student from Utrecht University, and have been using nixos on multiple devices for around a year now. I maintain a few packages and services, but would like to sink my teeth in to something more technically challenging/involved, e.g. compiler, bootup, etc... | 10:56:24 | |
| 14:58:59 | ||
| 15:13:03 | ||
| 15:43:33 | ||
| 15:57:52 | ||
| 19:44:28 | ||
| 19:52:02 | ||
| 20:27:50 | ||
| The review idea is a bit unorthodox if Google were to judge it by its title. I'd recommend to give it a twist, pick a particular set of packages, or a particular approach, perhaps automation. | 22:34:50 | |
| We don't have a designated mentor for this, but someone can still jump in. Knowing a mentor is not a requirement for submitting a proposal to GSoC | 22:36:28 | |