| 13 May 2025 |
 Perchun Pak [don't ping; dm instead] | How do I point out that derivation itself is a source?
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/development/libraries/astal/source.nix
https://nixpkgs-update-logs.nix-community.org/astal.source/2025-05-13.log | 12:22:51 |
 FliegendeWurst (@GPN23) | passthru.src = final; maybe | 13:53:40 |
| FliegendeWurst (@GPN23) | though the setup seems a bit odd to me anyway | 13:53:53 |
| FliegendeWurst (@GPN23) | why not just have the updateScript in one of the normal packages? | 13:54:34 |
| 14 May 2025 |
| Perchun Pak [don't ping; dm instead] | In reply to @fliegendewurst:matrix.org
why not just have the updateScript in one of the normal packages? So update bot would have a better name for PR | 11:38:55 |
| 18 May 2025 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | Okay, i give up-
Following package:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/by-name/sd/SDL_ttf/package.nix
We currently set the version "2.0.11.1-unstable-2024-04-23.
Upstream only has a tag for 2.0.11. They won't be tagging any more old versions for SDL_ttf for SDL1. But, canonically, we are on 2.0.11.1: https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL_ttf/commit/e31d11a692e5b55e8e624ad766e4e44d655422c8
Currently, running the update script on SDL_ttf just crashes, because the 2.0.11.1 tag does not exist. But removing the .1 isn't entirely correct either. What is the best way to make the update script succeed and still correctly represent the version? | 21:17:46 |
| FliegendeWurst (@GPN23) | Removing the ".1" seems correct to me, we use the last released version in the unstable naming scheme. | 21:21:51 |
| FliegendeWurst (@GPN23) | And 2.0.11 is the last released version | 21:21:58 |
