| 23 Jan 2026 |
|  luna 🏳️⚧️ set a profile picture. | 21:18:36 |
| 27 Jan 2026 |
|  whispers [& it/fae] changed their display name from whispers (it/fae) to whispers [& it/fae]. | 02:51:38 |
| 28 Jan 2026 |
|  mlyx joined the room. | 05:22:14 |
| 1 Feb 2026 |
|  Fernando Rodrigues changed their display name from SigmaSquadron to Fernando Rodrigues. | 10:42:51 |
| 2 Feb 2026 |
|  @sersorrel:matrix.org left the room. | 00:50:10 |
|  mdaniels5757 joined the room. | 02:40:31 |
| 8 Feb 2026 |
|  Grimmauld (migrated to @grimmauld:m.grimmauld.de) changed their display name from Grimmauld (any/all) to Grimmauld (migrated to @grimmauld:m.grimmauld.de). | 11:04:24 |
| Grimmauld (migrated to @grimmauld:m.grimmauld.de) left the room. | 11:12:01 |
|  knowledgeless joined the room. | 21:06:27 |
| 9 Feb 2026 |
 Diogo Correia | Hey guys I maintain dawarich in nixpkgs (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/by-name/da/dawarich/package.nix), but I've noticed that r-ryantm skips updating it because it uses "bundlerEnv": https://r.ryantm.com/log/dawarich/2026-02-03.log
https://github.com/nix-community/nixpkgs-update/blob/72155b18715b8008652001722172d819c0e54b2f/src/Skiplist.hs#L202
However, I have a custom update script that handles it correctly. Is it possible to force r-ryantm to update regardless of the skip list, and run passthru.updateScript instead?
| 13:15:15 |
| 19 Sep 2023 |
|  evils joined the room. | 16:15:20 |
 ryantm | raitobezarius: No, not really. It's been an idea for a long time to have grouped package updates like that, but it hasn't been implemented. | 16:52:21 |
| evils | hi, second link in the channel topic is dead | 19:21:58 |
| evils | is there a way to see what packages the bot tried to update but failed on? | 19:22:23 |
 Artturin | In reply to @evils:nixos.dev
is there a way to see what packages the bot tried to update but failed on? https://r.ryantm.com/log/ | 19:23:49 |
| Artturin | https://ryantm.github.io/nixpkgs-update/nixpkgs-maintainer-faq/#nixpkgs-maintainer-faq | 19:23:56 |
| Artturin | * from https://ryantm.github.io/nixpkgs-update/nixpkgs-maintainer-faq/#nixpkgs-maintainer-faq | 19:23:58 |
| evils | 
Download image.png | 19:24:43 |
| evils | oof that's a subtle link underline | 19:24:50 |
| evils | (i was looking at the page :) | 19:25:02 |
| Artturin | yeah | 19:26:15 |
| evils | ok, why do all KiCad update attempts end in "Do not update GNOME during a release cycle"? | 19:30:21 |
| ryantm |
| 19:44:27 |
| ryantm | * [ryantm@replit1:~/p/nixpkgs]$ EDITOR=echo nix edit -f . kicad
/home/ryantm/p/nixpkgs/pkgs/applications/science/electronics/kicad/default.nix
[ryantm@replit1:~/p/nixpkgs]$ cat /home/ryantm/p/nixpkgs/pkgs/applications/science/electronics/kicad/default.nix | grep gnome
, gnome
"--prefix XDG_DATA_DIRS : ${gnome.adwaita-icon-theme}/share" | 19:44:32 |
| Artturin | the check here is wrong https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update/blob/8fedf8f6f29280578e335bf4483c9f88d4bcdbaa/src/Skiplist.hs#L151 | 19:45:39 |
| Artturin | just a naive grep | 19:45:49 |
| Artturin | maybe a better way would be to check for teams.gnome.members | 19:47:29 |
| Artturin | still has false positives but way less | 19:47:37 |
| ryantm | https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update/commit/2fda8bcb73776c3e11c0155fa15e138a71e1f189 | 19:49:37 |
| evils | In reply to @artturin:matrix.org
the check here is wrong https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update/blob/8fedf8f6f29280578e335bf4483c9f88d4bcdbaa/src/Skiplist.hs#L151 huh, i see kicad a bit further down there, what does binariesStickAround imply? | 19:54:51 |
