| 24 Nov 2025 |
 raitobezarius | (and also let people stack up on new features that we don't want in core) | 23:04:56 |
 piegames | Okay, then how about: We kick the current deprecations down the road another release cycle and focus on more Flaker and npins stuff in the meantime, to take off infra load. This would however require reverting the already merged commits | 23:05:44 |
| raitobezarius | How do you see that doing so will take off infra load? | 23:08:31 |
| piegames | less need for merge queue, no need for community builders (AFnix), no need for you to manually play merge queue | 23:09:08 |
| raitobezarius | Flaker is not a dependency to achieve the Flakes extraction FWIW | 23:09:10 |
| piegames | no it is a dependency for the deprecations | 23:09:28 |
| raitobezarius | I will always have to play the manual merge queue, whether you send deprecations down the road or not, fwiw | 23:09:37 |
| raitobezarius | Community builders are being manifested as we speak right now, it's hard to cancel the operations :P | 23:09:59 |
| piegames | oh nice | 23:10:08 |
| raitobezarius | The only thing it does is reduce the importance of an automatic merge queue now | 23:10:12 |
| raitobezarius | having fun with CloudFlare servers | 23:10:24 |
| raitobezarius | 
Download clipboard.png | 23:10:28 |
| raitobezarius | So, it's really up to you | 23:11:48 |
| raitobezarius | I don't mind playing the merge queue for you because I already do it to some extent, whether you put more load or not, does not change my life too much | 23:12:03 |
| raitobezarius | aloisw you have this chain https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4346/7 sitting for a while, do you want to merge parts of it or is there a plan? | 23:45:20 |
| raitobezarius | cc ma27 | 23:45:26 |
| 25 Nov 2025 |
 aloisw | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
aloisw you have this chain https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4346/7 sitting for a while, do you want to merge parts of it or is there a plan? It might be nice if https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4563/3 could be merged, as it was already approved (without code owner permission though, so not submittable) and fix a user-facing issue. The rest mostly makes sense together and is still blocked. | 05:20:38 |
