!lymvtcwDJ7ZA9Npq:lix.systems

Lix Development

431 Members
(Technical) development of Lix, the package manager, a Nix implementation. Please be mindful of ongoing technical conversations in this channel.144 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
31 Mar 2026
@lisanna-dettwyler:matrix.orgLisanna

Jon Ericson and I have been working on getting a Store refector in to cppnix that separates building into its own class, which is the first step towards making implementing custom building logic more ergonomic. Once this is finalized and merged, would the Lix team be interested in accepting a port of this work for Lix?

https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/15542

20:05:31
@lisanna-dettwyler:matrix.orgLisanna *

John Ericson and I have been working on getting a Store refector in to cppnix that separates building into its own class, which is the first step towards making implementing custom building logic more ergonomic. Once this is finalized and merged, would the Lix team be interested in accepting a port of this work for Lix?

https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/15542

20:05:42
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)I am not sure any port of this nature can happen without more involvement with the development team, we have a bunch of plans of our own regarding this topic and we have noticed we do not share the same technical vision with CppNix (at least, based on public RFC information we were asked to give our opinion on) -- I wouldn't want to waste anyone's time on a port that would be -2 architecturally after a lot of efforts were made What would make more sense to me is to merge it and perhaps discuss your concepts in Lix's Zulip and see if there are interests to take the same architectural decisions, with this information, a "port" or doing the work would make sense IMHO20:20:57
@lisanna-dettwyler:matrix.orgLisannaAlright ^-^20:22:27
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)Thanks for the kind offer nonetheless!20:25:11
@lisanna-dettwyler:matrix.orgLisanna I'll put together some more information on use cases once it's finalized and join the zulip to discuss the idea 20:32:57
4 Apr 2026
@lotte:chir.rsLotte (it/its)/Cinny (she/her) θΔ& changed their profile picture.10:58:32
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchs lix in nixpkgs deprecation-warning about nixpkgs's export of lib.or is pretty funny though. 14:55:46
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchssome other deprecation warnings have been very helpful in finding very screwed-up regexes (or things that aren't actual regexes), so overall a fantastic release, thanks everyone who worked on getting these improvements out!15:05:31
@piegames:flausch.socialpiegames lib.or should have died over a decade ago. lib.or is the reason why the precedence is fucked around or as an operator 16:55:38
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchsAnything that speeds its demise is very welcome. What a weirdo identifier.17:10:10
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchsAlso, it is objectively hilarious17:10:32
5 Apr 2026
@lotte:chir.rsLotte (it/its)/Cinny (she/her) θΔ& changed their profile picture.16:57:20
6 Apr 2026
@lotte:chir.rsLotte (it/its)/Cinny (she/her) θΔ& changed their profile picture.13:47:41
@lotte:chir.rsLotte (it/its)/Cinny (she/her) θΔ& changed their profile picture.13:48:49
7 Apr 2026
@vigress9:matrix.org@vigress9:matrix.org removed their display name V. 🏳️‍⚧️.17:46:19
@vigress9:matrix.org@vigress9:matrix.org left the room.17:47:05
8 Apr 2026
@k900:0upti.meK900 Has anyone ever proposed a, like, --retry 3 option for nix-build? 20:30:18
@k900:0upti.meK900 I feel like I might have 20:30:22
@k900:0upti.meK900But my brain is also mush20:30:25
@xokdvium:matrix.orgSergei Zimmerman (xokdvium)
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
Has anyone ever proposed a, like, --retry 3 option for nix-build?
As in build attempts? That used to be a thing (though broken) in old nix versions I think
21:04:20
@k900:0upti.meK900Yes21:04:37
@k900:0upti.meK900This message in particular is brought to you by me trying to get flaky scipy tests to run overnight21:04:56
@xokdvium:matrix.orgSergei Zimmerman (xokdvium)Yeah I think there are even remnants of it in the daemon protocol21:05:06
@xokdvium:matrix.orgSergei Zimmerman (xokdvium)It was it about doing the build multiple times to check for determinism. Not sure21:08:01
@xokdvium:matrix.orgSergei Zimmerman (xokdvium)* Or was it about doing the build multiple times to check for determinism. Not sure21:08:09
9 Apr 2026
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchsThink buildbot had an option for that too01:27:07
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco joined the room.20:30:34
@lisanna-dettwyler:matrix.orgLisanna changed their profile picture.21:59:43
@lisanna-dettwyler:matrix.orgLisanna changed their profile picture.22:00:59

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10