| 29 Jul 2025 |
 emily | oh | 16:26:07 |
| emily | well yes sorry make it a FOD then 😅 | 16:26:17 |
 WeetHet | I've built my original one | 16:26:30 |
| WeetHet | Here's the debug log | 16:26:37 |
| emily | needs the daemon log I think | 16:26:42 |
| emily | maybe? | 16:26:51 |
| emily | raitobezarius: (does that user-facing warning actually reach the user when used via the daemon?) | 16:26:59 |
 raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm | 16:27:12 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | good question | 16:27:18 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | i think so yeah | 16:27:22 |
| WeetHet | Wait it built? | 16:27:30 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | we need to check | 16:27:34 |
| WeetHet | Oh because cache | 16:27:36 |
| WeetHet | Download out.log | 16:28:00 |
| WeetHet | Hmm I think I know what went wrong | 16:30:42 |
| WeetHet | One moment I need to check | 16:30:47 |
| emily | no "rendering visible configured CA '%s' in the builder" | 16:30:44 |
| emily | and no "Configured certificate authority '%1' exists but is inaccessible" | 16:30:54 |
| emily | can you nix store ping | 16:30:59 |
| emily | oh | 16:31:10 |
| emily | raitobezarius!!!! | 16:31:15 |
| emily | the call is inside the damn Linux conditional lol | 16:31:19 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | yes | 16:31:25 |
| WeetHet | One of them yes | 16:31:26 |
| WeetHet | There are two
| 16:31:30 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | this is why i said i know where it is ;P | 16:31:29 |
| emily | yes but the other is !useChroot | 16:31:41 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | correct | 16:31:44 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | it should be a trivial fix | 16:31:46 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | but i cannot test it automatically alas | 16:31:57 |
