| 14 Oct 2025 |
emily | it could just be a boolean | 19:40:30 |
raitobezarius | detect NULs in a string OR detect NUL support in strings? | 19:40:37 |
emily | builtins.nulBytesInStrings or false | 19:40:39 |
jade_ | yes, that's what builtins.features is for :) | 19:40:40 |
raitobezarius | i read the question in a different way | 19:40:41 |
emily | fair enough | 19:40:49 |
jade_ | we should not pollute the builtins namespace itself | 19:40:50 |
raitobezarius | i thought this was about builtins.doesItHaveSomeNuls s | 19:40:51 |
emily | no, it's about being able to portably use NUL bytes | 19:41:10 |
jade_ | the only reason we don't have builtins.features is cuz nobody had time to do it yet | 19:41:20 |
Qyriad | does it need any further design work or anything? | 22:10:45 |
| 15 Oct 2025 |
helle (just a stray cat girl) | we are having a laugh/cry at the CI pipeline due to a merge requiring a rebase and that requiring a CI pass, it's an understandable problem, but we missed the window due to us having a migraine | 09:23:17 |
raitobezarius | Soon, merge queue | 09:58:31 |
helle (just a stray cat girl) | yes pls | 09:58:41 |
helle (just a stray cat girl) | it's getting slightly comedic | 09:58:57 |
Rutile (rootile) | yeahhhh | 10:08:48 |
helle (just a stray cat girl) | in some ways this is a good problem to have, means people are actually working on patches, etc, but uh, we bet like half the current CI action is rebase to merge due to rebase due to missing the window | 10:15:11 |
Rutile (rootile) | and/or maybe a ci skip, if only files of /doc have been touched without any code or test changes | 10:17:46 |