| 18 Nov 2025 |
 Winter | Contrary to the release notes, we did not observe a 38 % improvement on nix search.
this should clarify that it's (presumably) referencing the Nix relnotes | 16:52:48 |
 raitobezarius | it refers to our own release notes | 16:53:44 |
| raitobezarius | i should probably update the actual number we figured out | 16:53:57 |
| raitobezarius | it went past review | 16:54:05 |
| Winter | build-dir no longer defaults to temp-dir
I was under the impression that this is also true in 2.93.{1..} -- if it is, maybe make the differences between latest 2.93.z and 2.94.0 the only thing there to avoid confusion? Or is this just for greater visibility? | 16:57:00 |
| raitobezarius | yeah, i was on the edge on this one | 16:57:46 |
| raitobezarius | and i consider that repeating things is key to pedagogy | 16:57:54 |
| raitobezarius | there's extra information in the blog post around this feature | 16:58:03 |
| raitobezarius | namely two things | 16:58:04 |
| raitobezarius | (a) the Darwin fixes | 16:58:07 |
| raitobezarius | (b) the sysadmin guidance on tmpfs | 16:58:11 |
| raitobezarius | i did mark things that were already in 2.93.1 normally in the body, but the release notes are "raw" | 16:58:31 |
| Winter | but the release notes are "raw"
still kinda not accurate if it's in the 2.94 relnotes bc it was in 2.93...? | 16:59:06 |
| raitobezarius | 2.94 branched off 2.93.0 | 17:00:12 |
| raitobezarius | * 2.94.0 branched off 2.93.0 | 17:00:14 |
| raitobezarius | so effectively, it's a "new" thing in the 2.94 series | 17:00:21 |
| raitobezarius | but i understand what you are trying to say | 17:00:26 |
