| 6 Sep 2025 |
aloisw | So basically multiplexing between different upstreams, with both the zone and the upstream server assigned to the link in some way? | 13:29:06 |
raitobezarius | yep | 13:29:12 |
aloisw | Yeah I'd not really expect unbound or knot-resolver to support that in a nice way indeed. Their expected use case seems more to let them do recursion themselves. | 13:31:00 |
aloisw | I guess if the links are static, you could configure the forwarding manually. But it's going to be annoying if they can come and go dynamically. | 13:39:46 |
| 7 Sep 2025 |
emily | raitobezarius: do you have an estimate for how soon you plan to amend the drop PR in Nixpkgs? | 02:35:38 |
emily | would be great to move forward with toml11 and if 2.93 is all that's required there it would be convenient | 02:35:54 |
emily | (or I could just mark the other ones broken :P) | 02:37:40 |
aloisw | What do I have to enter into buildkite to manually start a job for a given CL again? I forgot whether to put the commit hash into its field and what to put in the branch. | 09:32:28 |
aloisw | What the heck is going on here? That's nixpkgs 24.11 before the toml11 bump: https://buildkite.com/lix-project/lix/builds/4357#01992389-f64c-4437-a922-998d418e1dec/38-47 | 09:57:16 |
Sergei Zimmerman (xokdvium) | 24.11 nixpkgsLibTests evalutated the misc.nix tests with the host nix, not the one that's being tested. Might be that the CI is dogfooding a recent build of Lix? | 10:06:29 |
aloisw | Still happening on 25.05: https://buildkite.com/lix-project/lix/builds/4358#019923aa-4e21-4225-bfca-d98763a1e5da/30-39 | 10:55:39 |
aloisw | Also aarch64-linux only, what the heck. | 10:56:01 |
Sergei Zimmerman (xokdvium) |
- Which lix is the CI running and 2. Nixpkgs input probably needs https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/434761
| 11:12:15 |
aloisw |
- is for the infra folks to answer. 2. should probably be done on all branches then?
| 11:34:07 |
aloisw | I guess a different Lix running on the x86_64-linux and aarch64-linux builders could explain the difference. | 11:34:42 |