!lymvtcwDJ7ZA9Npq:lix.systems

Lix Development

451 Members
(Technical) development of Lix, the package manager, a Nix implementation. Please be mindful of ongoing technical conversations in this channel.148 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
9 Jun 2026
@lotte:chir.rsLotte (it/its)/Cinny (she/her) θΔ& changed their profile picture.13:24:21
10 Jun 2026
@astreaprtcl:c-6.devAstreaprtcl the CI for https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/5646 seems to be stuck with broken pipe could someone please try to restart the jobs? 05:44:23
@rootile:flausch.socialRutiledone ^^07:55:08
@astreaprtcl:c-6.devAstreaprtclty :307:55:19
11 Jun 2026
@astreaprtcl:c-6.devAstreaprtcl i am sorry to bother, but it seems the pipeline has failed with dns issues https://buildkite.com/afnix/lix/builds/1898 10:09:17
12 Jun 2026
@dontblameme:matrix.orgDontBlameMe joined the room.16:25:50
13 Jun 2026
@debtquity:matrix.orgdebtquity set a profile picture.03:23:23
@pengo:pengo.ukPengo joined the room.08:02:46
@brume:mortebrume.eubrume joined the room.16:22:49
17 Jun 2026
@akajibi:matrix.orgJibi joined the room.14:12:35
18 Jun 2026
@opna2608:matrix.orgPuna

would it be acceptable to raise the timeout on the functional2 testsuite to like, triple its current value (300 seconds)? my ppc64 hardware is nowhere close to completing that in time when building lixPackageSets.latest.lix in Nixpkgs

lix> 80/80 installcheck - lix:functional2                                             OK              712.47s   1118 subtests passed
13:20:36
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusShould it be sent to nixpkgs or do you need it on the HEAD builds as well?13:26:49
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI'd also say that a conditional timeout based on the architecture doesn't surprise me at all13:27:02
@opna2608:matrix.orgPunawell the machine is sadly 21 years old, so that's prolly the main reason for it taking so long… just the cheapest available ppc64 hardware13:28:29
@opna2608:matrix.orgPunai'm fine with w/e, would just like to avoid carrying a patch for this in my branch forever13:29:56
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusplease send it first to nixpkgs if that's what you are using with a conditional to keep the short timeout for fast architectures and a default slow timeouts for others architectures13:30:19
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusput me reviewer and i will take care of it13:30:22
@opna2608:matrix.orgPuna well, a more recent POWER machine bought from IBM (or prolly smth from raptor too) would likely be fine with the current timeout. it's not really an issue with the architecture, just with me not being made out of money to afford fancy new machines :)
but can discuss that on the pull request ig
13:34:29
@opna2608:matrix.orgPuna * well, a more recent POWER machine bought from IBM (or prolly smth from raptor too) would likely be fine with the current timeout. it's not really an issue with the architecture, just with me not being made out of money to afford fancy new machines :)
but can discuss that on the pull request ig
edit: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/532989
16:40:49
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers [& it/fae] changed their display name from whispers [& it/fae] to meow meow.18:47:00
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers [& it/fae] changed their display name from meow meow to whispers [& it/fae].19:12:37

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10